Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496426›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

A population approach using cholesterol imputation to identify adults with high cardiovascular risk: a report from AHRQ's EvidenceNow initiative.

Samuel Cykert, Darren A DeWalt, Bryan J Weiner, Michael Pignone, Jason Fine, Jung In Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel CykertThe Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Darren A DeWaltThe Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Michael PignoneThe Department of Medicine, The Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jason FineThe Department of Biostatistics, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jung In KimThe Department of Biostatistics, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Facilitation, Spread and Translation of Patient-Centered Evidence in NC PracticesR18HS023912 · AHRQ · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CYKERT, SAMUEL NMN · 2015 to 2017
$14.8M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Large practice networks have access to EHR data that can be used to drive important improvements in population health. However, missing data often limit improvement efforts. Our goal was to determine the proportion of patients in a cohort of small primary care practices who lacked cholesterol data to calculate ASCVD risk scores and then gauge the extent that imputation can accurately identify individuals already at high risk. 219 practices enrolled. Patients between the ages of 40 and 79 years qualified for risk calculation. For patients who lacked cholesterol data, we measured the effect of employing a conservative estimation strategy using a total cholesterol of 170 mg/dl and HDL-cholesterol of 50 mg/dl in the ASCVD risk equation to identify patients with ≥ 10%, 10-year ASCVD risk who were eligible for risk reduction interventions then compared this to a rigorous formal imputation methodology. 345 440 patients, average age 58 years, qualified for risk scores. 108 515 patients were missing cholesterol information. Using the "good value" estimation methodology, 40 565 had risk scores ≥ 10% compared to 43 205 using formal imputation. However, the latter strategy yielded a lower specificity and higher false positive rate. Estimates using either strategy achieved ASCVD risk stratification quickly and accurately identified high risk patients who could benefit from intervention.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgedCholesterolFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityCholesterol

Identifiers

PMID30496426
PMCPMC6373981
OpenAlexW2902681987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.