Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496249›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Monitoring the parasite load in chronic Chagas disease patients: comparison between blood culture and quantitative real time PCR.

Daniella Alchaar D'Ávila, Lúcia Maria C Galvão, Giovane R Sousa, Constança Britto, Otacilio C Moreira, Egler Chiari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk factors for vertical transmission of Chagas disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Association BetweenFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. A SpecificFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Progression of Cardiac ChronicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Parasite Burden ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of PET/CT to detect myocardial inflammation and the risk of malignant arrhythmia in chronic Chagas disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Animal Models ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Discrete Typing Units ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniella Alchaar D'ÁvilaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Lúcia Maria C GalvãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Giovane R SousaSection on Immunobiology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0085-3882
Constança BrittoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, RJ, Brazil.
Otacilio C MoreiraLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-8697
Egler ChiariPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Parasitologia, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRJoslin Diabetes Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the improvements in diagnostic tools for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in human blood samples, the isolation of parasite from bloodstream in the chronic phase of Chagas disease is challenging. Thus, there is an increasing interest in the development of strategies that allow an accurate monitoring of the parasite load in bloodstream of Chagas disease patients. Given that, the comparison of a classical diagnostic method such as blood culture and multiplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was few explored so far. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the detection and quantification of T. cruzi load in the circulating blood of patients with chronic Chagas disease, using blood culture and qPCR techniques. METHODS⁄PRINCIPAL

findingsThe multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay (qPCR) based on TaqMan technology was evaluated in 135 blood samples from 91 patients with chronic Chagas disease presenting indeterminate (asymptomatic, n = 23) and cardiac (chronic cardiomyopathy, n = 68) forms, in comparison with the classical blood culture (BC) technique. The total positivity of qPCR and BC was 58.5% and 49.6%, respectively. The median parasite load of all positive patients was 1.18 [0.39-4.23] par. eq.⁄mL, ranging from 0.01 to 116.10 par. eq.⁄mL. We did not find significant differences between T. cruzi load with age and distinct clinical manifestations of patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data suggest that qPCR can be an auxiliary tool for studies that require T. cruzi isolation from the bloodstream of patients with chronic Chagas disease, after the establishment of a parasite load cut-off that guarantees a relative success rate of parasite isolation using BC technique.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood CultureChagas DiseaseDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParasite LoadReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTrypanosoma cruziYoung AdultDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID30496249
PMCPMC6264508
OpenAlexW2902936442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.