Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3049620›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1988

Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle.

C W Jacobs, A E Adams, P J Szaniszlo, J R Pringle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nuclear movement in multinucleated cells.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell cycle arrest ofSTAR protocols · 2021
    Article
  8. The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Nuclear movement in fungi.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C W JacobsDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
A E Adams
P J Szaniszlo
J R Pringle

Funding

MORPHOGENESIS AND CYTOKINESIS IN THE YEAST CELL CYCLER37GM031006 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PRINGLE, JOHN R · 2000 to 2010
$4.8M
CELLULAR MORPHOGENESIS IN THE YEAST CELL CYCLEF32GM009727 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JACOBS, CHARLES W · 1985 to 1985
–
GENETIC STUDY OF THE YEAST CELL CYCLER01GM031006 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PRINGLE, JOHN R · 1986 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-09727NIGMS NIH HHS GM-31006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used the inhibitor nocodazole in conjunction with immunofluorescence and electron microscopy to investigate microtubule function in the yeast cell cycle. Under appropriate conditions, this drug produced a rapid and essentially complete disassembly of cytoplasmic and intranuclear microtubules, accompanied by a rapid and essentially complete block of cellular and nuclear division. These effects were similar to, but more profound than, the effects of the related drug methyl benzimidazole carbamate (MBC). In the nocodazole-treated cells, the selection of nonrandom budding sites, the formation of chitin rings and rings of 10-nm filaments at those sites, bud emergence, differential bud enlargement, and apical bud growth appeared to proceed normally, and the intracellular distribution of actin was not detectably perturbed. Thus, the cytoplasmic microtubules are apparently not essential for the establishment of cell polarity and the localization of cell-surface growth. In contrast, nocodazole profoundly affected the behavior of the nucleus. Although spindle-pole bodies (SPBs) could duplicate in the absence of microtubules, SPB separation was blocked. Moreover, complete spindles present at the beginning of drug treatment appeared to collapse, drawing the opposed SPBs and associated nuclear envelope close together. Nuclei did not migrate to the mother-bud necks in nocodazole-treated cells, although nuclei that had reached the necks before drug treatment remained there. Moreover, the double SPBs in arrested cells were often not oriented toward the budding sites, in contrast to the situation in normal cells. Thus, microtubules (cytoplasmic, intranuclear, or both) appear to be necessary for the migration and proper orientation of the nucleus, as well as for SPB separation, spindle function, and nuclear division.

Indexed as

Cell CycleActinsBenzimidazolesCell CompartmentationCell NucleusFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMicroscopy, ElectronMicrotubulesMorphogenesisNocodazoleSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpindle ApparatusTubulinActinsBenzimidazolesNocodazoleTubulin

Identifiers

PMID3049620
PMCPMC2115239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.