Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496030›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2018

Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio): An Introductory Laboratory Curriculum That Increases Undergraduates' Scientific Agency and Skills.

Susan D Hester, Michele Nadler, Jennifer Katcher, Lisa K Elfring, Emily Dykstra, Lisa F Rezende, Molly S Bolger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan D HesterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Michele NadlerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Jennifer KatcherDepartment of Mathematics and Sciences, Pima Community College, Tucson, AZ 85709.
Lisa K ElfringDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Emily DykstraDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Lisa F RezendeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Molly S BolgerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing opportunities for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics undergraduates to engage in authentic scientific practices is likely to influence their view of science and may impact their decision to persist through graduation. Laboratory courses provide a natural place to introduce students to scientific practices, but existing curricula often miss this opportunity by focusing on confirming science content rather than exploring authentic questions. Integrating authentic science within laboratory courses is particularly challenging at high-enrollment institutions and community colleges, where access to research-active faculty may be limiting. The Authentic Inquiry through Modeling in Biology (AIM-Bio) curriculum presented here engages students in authentic scientific practices through iterative cycles of model generation, testing, and revision. AIM-Bio university and community college students demonstrated their ability to propose diverse models for biological phenomena, formulate and address hypotheses by designing and conducting experiments, and collaborate with classmates to revise models based on experimental data. Assessments demonstrated that AIM-Bio students had an enhanced sense of project ownership and greater identification as scientists compared with students in existing laboratory courses. AIM-Bio students also experienced measurable gains in their nature of science understanding and skills for doing science. Our results suggest AIM-Bio as a potential alternative to more resource-intensive curricula with similar outcomes.

Indexed as

CurriculumLaboratoriesModels, EducationalStudentsThinkingBacteriaBiologyChlamydomonasFacultyHumansOwnershipPhototaxisResearchResearch PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID30496030
PMCPMC6755888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.