Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3048974›Full record

Trial reportDrugs1988

Ceftriaxone. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and an update on its therapeutic use with particular reference to once-daily administration.

R N Brogden, A Ward

Abstract readClinical TrialReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1995
    Trial
  4. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1989
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Clinical role of protein binding of quinolones.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2002
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Brain Abscess.Current treatment options in neurology · 1999
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R N BrogdenADIS Drug Information Services, Auckland.
A Ward

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since ceftriaxone was first reviewed in the Journal, further studies have confirmed its broad antibacterial spectrum in vitro and extended its clinical documentation in comparative studies with other widely used drugs in infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tract, meningitis in infants and children, uncomplicated gonorrhoea, perioperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery, and in several other types of infection. As in earlier studies, which primarily used a twice-daily dosage regimen, few significant differences were found between therapeutic groups in comparative studies and results have demonstrated the efficacy of once-daily ceftriaxone in all but the most serious infections, such as sole antibiotic therapy in pseudomonal infections. Wider clinical experience has established that ceftriaxone is generally well tolerated. Thus, ceftriaxone now has a well-defined place as an appropriate alternative for the parenteral treatment of a variety of infections due to susceptible organisms, as well as for perioperative prophylaxis of surgery, and may offer advantages of greater convenience over other parenteral antibiotics which are administered more frequently.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsCeftriaxoneClinical Trials as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleHumansCeftriaxone

Identifiers

PMID3048974
OpenAlexW1964360986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.