Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30489638›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Katie Young, Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava, Loki Natarajan, Emily Myers, Andrew C Dietz, Jessica R Gorman, María Elena Martínez, Brian W Whitcomb, H Irene Su

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06757465 (The Effect of Counseling Grounded in Watson's Human Caring Theory on Reproductive Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06757465 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Counseling Grounded in Watson's Human Caring Theory on Reproductive Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEge UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsReproductive HealthArmsCounseling education based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Calidad de Vida: a systematic review of quality of life in Latino cancer survivors in the USA.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Desire for future children and interest in consultation with a fertility specialist among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  8. Suboptimal quality of female oncofertility care is associated with lowered quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Gravida and Birth Outcomes Prior to and after Diagnosis of Early Age-Onset Colorectal Cancer among Female Patients: Population-Based Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceived impact of a decision-aid and planning tool for family building after cancer for young adult female cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Online discussions about cancer and fertility: an analysis of Reddit threads.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie YoungSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
Ksenya ShliakhtsitsavaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Loki NatarajanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
Emily MyersMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
Andrew C DietzMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
Jessica R GormanSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
María Elena MartínezDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
Brian W WhitcombDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
H Irene SuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Reproductive Window in Young Adult Cancer SurvivorsR01HD080952 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SU, HUI-CHUN IRENE · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFertility counseling before cancer treatment has been advocated by clinical guidelines, though little is known about its long-term impact on the unique reproductive concerns of female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. The goal of this study was to measure the association between fertility counseling by fertility specialists before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns.

methodA cross-sectional analysis was performed among 747 AYA survivors aged 18-40 years who had been recruited from cancer registries and physician and advocacy group referrals between 2015 and 2017. Participants self-reported information on past fertility counseling at cancer diagnosis, cancer type and treatment, and current reproductive concerns, as measured using the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale. Multivariable log-binomial regression models tested associations between fertility counseling and reproductive concerns.

resultsThe mean age of the cohort was 33.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years), and the mean period since diagnosis was 7.7 years (standard deviation, 5.0 years). Seventy-three percent of participants were white, and 24% were Hispanic. Fertility counseling was reported by 19% of survivors; moderate to high overall reproductive concerns were reported by 44% of participants. In adjusted analysis, fertility counseling was significantly associated with moderate to high reproductive concerns (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.45) and not modified by exposure to fertility-threatening treatments (P

conclusionA large proportion of AYA cancer survivors across cancer types and treatment exposures reported moderate to high reproductive concerns, suggesting that there is a need to address these cancer-specific reproductive health concerns after treatment. Higher concerns, even with counseling, suggests the need to improve the quality of fertility counseling throughout the cancer continuum.

Indexed as

FertilityAdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsCohort StudiesCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFertility PreservationHumansNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicYoung Adultcancerfemalefertility counselingfertility preservationreproductive concernsyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID30489638
PMCPMC6402962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.