ArticlePharmacogenetics and genomics2019
Analytical validity of a genotyping assay for use with personalized antihypertensive and chronic kidney disease therapy.
Article in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Genotype-Specific Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol in Healthy Volunteers.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Development of a Multifaceted Program for Pharmacogenetics Adoption at an Academic Medical Center: Practical Considerations and Lessons Learned.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a pharmacogenomics reporting workflow based on the illumina global screening array chip.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Pharmacogenomic and Statistical Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension in CKD: The CKD-PGX Study.Kidney360 · 2022Article
- Validation of a Large Custom-Designed Pharmacogenomics Panel on an Array Genotyping Platform.The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2021Article
- Implementation of a Renal Precision Medicine Program: Clinician Attitudes and Acceptance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Genotype-Guided Hydralazine Therapy.American journal of nephrology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension and chronic kidney disease are inextricably linked. Hypertension is a well-recognized contributor to chronic kidney disease progression and, in turn, renal disease potentiates hypertension. A generalized approach to drug selection and dosage has not proven effective in managing these conditions, in part, because patients with heterogeneous kidney disease and hypertension etiologies are frequently grouped according to functional or severity classifications. Genetic testing may serve as an important tool in the armamentarium of clinicians who embrace precision medicine. Increasing scientific evidence has supported the utilization of genomic information to select efficacious antihypertensive therapy and understand hereditary contributors to chronic kidney disease progression. Given the wide array of antihypertensive agents available and diversity of genetic renal disease predictors, a panel-based approach to genotyping may be an efficient and economic means of establishing an individualized blood pressure response profile for patients with various forms of chronic kidney disease and hypertension. In this manuscript, we discuss the validation process of a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved genetic test to relay information on 72 genetic variants associated with kidney disease progression and hypertension therapy. These genomic-based interventions, in addition to routine clinical data, may help inform physicians to provide personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.