Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30489255›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Neural activity related to volitional regulation of cortical excitability.

Kathy Ruddy, Joshua Balsters, Dante Mantini, Quanying Liu, Pegah Kassraian-Fard, Nadja Enz, Ernest Mihelj, Bankim Subhash Chander, Surjo R Soekadar, Nicole Wenderoth

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06164912 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Use of a Brain-computer Interface Based on TMS Neurofeedback for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Dublin, Trinity CollegeRan2023 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity ParesisArmsTranscranial Magnetic Simulation with Pseudofeedback, Transcranial Magnetic Simulation with Neurofeedback
NCT07440459 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing and Modeling the Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot Aided Neurorehabilitation of Walking

TypeobservationalSponsorBioRobotics Group - Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Spinal Cord Injury, Neurorehabilitation, Robot Assisted Gait Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Brain-computer interface-based neurofeedback training enables transferable control of cortical state switching in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. TMS-Based Neurofeedback Training of Mental Finger Individuation Induces Neuroplastic Changes in the Sensorimotor System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathy RuddyNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-0423
Joshua BalstersNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-6990
Dante MantiniNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-5559
Quanying LiuNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-7656
Pegah Kassraian-FardNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-7918
Nadja EnzNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-4710
Ernest MiheljNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-2553
Bankim Subhash ChanderApplied Neurotechnology Laboratory, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-8822
Surjo R SoekadarApplied Neurotechnology Laboratory, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-5538
Nicole WenderothNeural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3246-9386

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 320030_175616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date there exists no reliable method to non-invasively upregulate or downregulate the state of the resting human motor system over a large dynamic range. Here we show that an operant conditioning paradigm which provides neurofeedback of the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), enables participants to self-modulate their own brain state. Following training, participants were able to robustly increase (by 83.8%) and decrease (by 30.6%) their MEP amplitudes. This volitional up-versus down-regulation of corticomotor excitability caused an increase of late-cortical disinhibition (LCD), a TMS derived read-out of presynaptic GABA

Indexed as

AdultBrainCortical ExcitabilityElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMotor CortexNeurophysiologyRestTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTranscriptional Activationdisinhibitionexcitabilitygammahumanmotorneural oscillationsneurofeedbackneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30489255
PMCPMC6294548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.