Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30489196›Full record

SynthesisJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2019

Factors Affecting Adolescents' Willingness to Communicate Symptoms During Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review from the Children's Oncology Group.

Colleen A McLaughlin, Kristi Gordon, Jennifer Hoag, Lori Ranney, Nancy B Terwilliger, Tonya Ureda, Cheryl Rodgers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self-efficacy in symptom management for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Colleen A McLaughlin1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Blood & Marrow Transplant, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kristi Gordon2 Department of Hematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplant, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
Jennifer Hoag3 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Lori Ranney4 Department of Cancer and Blood Disorders Clinic, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nancy B Terwilliger2 Department of Hematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplant, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
Tonya Ureda5 Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Transplant, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Cheryl Rodgers6 Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USDuke University · USChildren’s Minnesota - St. Paul Hospital · USLevine Children's Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) synthesize evidence facilitators and barriers affecting adolescent willingness to communicate symptoms to health care providers (HCPs) and (2) create practice recommendations. The PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) question guiding the review was, among adolescents with cancer, what factors affect their willingness to communicate symptoms to HCPs? Three databases, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO, were searched using keywords from the PICOT question. Inclusion criteria included original research studies with samples of at least 51% adolescents aged 10-18 years who were receiving or had received cancer treatment. Studies were included that evaluated outcomes related to willingness to communicate in general as well as communication of specific treatment symptoms. Exclusion criteria included systematic reviews and publications emphasizing cancer screening, cancer prevention, survivorship, or decision making. A total of 11 studies were included in the systematic review. Two of the studies focused on symptom communication; the remaining nine studies focused on general communication or the overlap between general and symptom communication. Barriers to symptom and/or general communication included negative expectations, health-related uncertainty, ambiguousness with assessments, unfamiliarity, restriction of information, perceived negative provider characteristics/behaviors, adolescent circumstance, worry about others' perceptions, and provider approach. Facilitators to symptom and/or general communication included open communication, perceived favorable provider characteristics/behaviors, seasoned adolescent, and patient-provider rapport. Five practice recommendations were developed from the evidence that supports general and symptom communication between adolescents who are receiving or have completed cancer treatment and their HCPs.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildHealth PersonnelHumansNeoplasmsStress, PsychologicalSymptom Assessmentadolescentsbarrierscancerfacilitatorssymptom communication

Identifiers

PMID30489196
PMCPMC6939582
OpenAlexW2903368147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.