Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488765›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

The COMiT'ID Study: Developing Core Outcome Domains Sets for Clinical Trials of Sound-, Psychology-, and Pharmacology-Based Interventions for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus in Adults.

Deborah A Hall, Harriet Smith, Alice Hibbert, Veronica Colley, Haúla F Haider, Adele Horobin, Alain Londero, Birgit Mazurek, Brian Thacker, Kathryn Fackrell and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Current State of Tinnitus Diagnosis and Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Expert Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tinnitus Guidelines and Their Evidence Base.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Chronic Tinnitus in a German Tertiary Clinical Real-World Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Deborah A Hall1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-1452
Harriet Smith1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.
Alice Hibbert1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.
Veronica Colley1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.
Haúla F Haider5 ENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo-Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Adele Horobin1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7120-4612
Alain Londero6 Service ORL et CCF, Consultation Acouphène et Hyperacousie, Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou, Paris, France.
Birgit Mazurek7 Tinnitus Center, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Brian Thacker1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.
Kathryn Fackrell1 National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, UK.
Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus (COMiT) initiative
University of Nottingham · GBNational Health Service · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHôpital Européen · FR

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subjective tinnitus is a chronic heterogeneous condition that is typically managed using intervention approaches based on sound devices, psychologically informed therapies, or pharmaceutical products. For clinical trials, there are currently no common standards for assessing or reporting intervention efficacy. This article reports on the first of two steps to establish a common standard, which identifies what specific tinnitus-related complaints ("outcome domains") are critical and important to assess in all clinical trials to determine whether an intervention has worked. Using purposive sampling, 719 international health-care users with tinnitus, health-care professionals, clinical researchers, commercial representatives, and funders were recruited. Eligibility was primarily determined by experience of one of the three interventions of interest. Following recommended procedures for gaining consensus, three intervention-specific, three-round, Delphi surveys were delivered online. Each Delphi survey was followed by an in-person consensus meeting. Viewpoints and votes involved all stakeholder groups, with approximately a 1:1 ratio of health-care users to professionals. "Tinnitus intrusiveness" was voted in for all three interventions. For sound-based interventions, the minimum set included "ability to ignore," "concentration," "quality of sleep," and "sense of control." For psychology-based interventions, the minimum set included "acceptance of tinnitus," "mood," "negative thoughts and beliefs," and "sense of control." For pharmacology-based interventions, "tinnitus loudness" was the only additional core outcome domain. The second step will next identify how those outcome domains should best be measured. The uptake of these intervention-specific standards in clinical trials will improve research quality, enhance clinical decision-making, and facilitate meta-analysis in systematic reviews.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicConsensusDelphi TechniqueEndpoint DeterminationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresResearch DesignStakeholder ParticipationTinnitusTreatment Outcomeassessmentpatient-reported outcome measuresstakeholder agreementtreatment effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID30488765
PMCPMC6277759
OpenAlexW2902904926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.