ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018
Activated tyrosine kinases in gastrointestinal stromal tumor with loss of KIT oncoprotein expression.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different contributions of YAP1 and TAZ in the regulation of GIST tumorigenic properties.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Targeted Therapy for Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Evolution and Future Directions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Kaempferols from Echinacea purpurea demonstrate anti-cancer potential by targeting anexelekto in breast cancer therapy using chemoinformatics approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- AT101 Suppresses Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Growth and Promotes Apoptosis via YAP/TAZ-CCND1 and FBXW7-MCL1 Axes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Augmenting precision medicine via targeted RNA-Seq detection of expressed mutations.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Preclinical Models of Visceral Sarcomas.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Advances in immunology and immunotherapy for mesenchymal gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Tensin2 Is a Novel Diagnostic Marker in GIST, Associated with Gastric Location and Non-Metastatic Tumors.Cancers · 2022Article
- Targeting the translational machinery in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a new therapeutic vulnerability.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Advances in the research of the mechanism of secondary resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- KITMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2021Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): Novel Therapeutic Strategies with Immunotherapy and Small Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Proteasome Inhibition Suppresses KIT-Independent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Via Targeting Hippo/YAP/Cyclin D1 Signaling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- AXL Inactivation Inhibits Mesothelioma Growth and Migration via Regulation of p53 Expression.Cancers · 2020Article
- Coordinated targeting of CK2 and KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations are compelling therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and the KIT/PDGFRA kinase inhibitor, imatinib, is the standard of care for patients with metastatic GIST. However, approximately 10% of KIT-positive GIST metastases lose KIT expression at the time of clinical progression during imatinib therapy. In the present report, we performed TK-activation screens, using phosphotyrosine-TK double immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry, in GIST in vitro models lacking KIT expression. These studies demonstrated tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR, AXL, and EPHA2 in four of six KIT-negative GIST lines (GIST62, GIST522, GIST54, GIST226, GIST48B, and GIST430B), and tyrosine-phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in each of the six KIT-negative lines. AXL expression was strong in KIT-negative or -weak clinical GIST samples that were obtained from progressing metastases during imatinib therapy. AXL knockdown inhibited viability in three KIT-negative GIST cell lines (GIST62, GIST54, and GIST522), but not in an AXL-negative, KIT-positive GIST control cell line (GIST430). AXL inhibition by R428, a specific AXL kinase inhibitor, reduced viability in AXL-activated GIST54. AXL knockdown in GIST62, GIST522, and GIST54 was accompanied by an increase in p21, p27, and p53 expression. By contrast, gefitinib-mediated EGFR inhibition, PF562271-mediated FAK inactivation, and shRNA-mediated knockdowns of EPHA2 and FAK had no effect on viability or colony formation of the KIT-negative GISTs. These findings highlight the potential relevance of AXL/p53 signaling as a therapeutic target in a subset of GISTs that have lost KIT oncoprotein expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.