ArticleMedical physics2019
Non-stationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: I. Point spread function.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Non-Isocentric Geometry for Next-Generation Tomosynthesis With Super-Resolution.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Proposing Rapid Source Pulsing for Improved Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn previous work, a theoretical model of the point spread function (PSF) for oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium (a-Se) detectors was proposed. The purpose of this paper is to develop a complementary model that includes two additional features. First, the incidence angle and the directionality of ray incidence are calculated at each position, assuming a divergent x-ray beam geometry. This approach allows the non-stationarity of the PSF to be modeled. Second, this paper develops a framework that is applicable to a digital system, unlike previous work which did not model the presence of a thin-film transistor (TFT) array.
methodsAt each point on the detector, the incidence angle and the ray incidence direction are determined using ray tracing. Based on these calculations, an existing model for the PSF of the x-ray converter (Med Phys. 1995;22:365-374) is generalized to a non-stationary model. The PSF is convolved with the product of two rectangle functions, which model the sampling of the TFT array. The rectangle functions match the detector element (del) size in two dimensions.
resultsIt is shown that the PSF can be calculated in closed form. This solution is used to simulate a digital mammography (DM) system at two x-ray energies (20 and 40 keV). Based on the divergence of the x-ray beam, the direction of ray incidence varies with position. Along this direction, the PSF is broader than the reference rect function matching the del size. The broadening is more pronounced with increasing obliquity. At high energy, the PSF deviates more strongly from the reference rect function, indicating that there is more blurring. In addition, the PSF is calculated along the polar angle perpendicular to the ray incidence direction. For this polar angle, the shape of the PSF is dependent upon whether the ray incidence direction is parallel with the sides of the detector. If the ray incidence direction is parallel with either dimension, the PSF is a perfect rectangle function, matching the del size. However, if the ray incidence direction is at an oblique angle relative to the sides of the detector, the PSF is not rectangular. These results illustrate the non-stationarity of the PSF.
conclusionsThis paper demonstrates that an existing model of the PSF of a-Se detectors can be generalized to include the effects of non-stationarity and digitization. The PSF is determined in closed form. This solution offers the advantage of shorter computation time relative to approaches that use numerical methods. This model is a tool for simulating a-Se detectors in future work, such as in virtual clinical trials with computational phantoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.