Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488368›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a French case-control-control study.

Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine, Marie Vigan, Cédric Laouénan, Jérôme Robert, “E-carb Study Group”

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the Spotlight:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Risk factors for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: A case-control study.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinical Predispositions, Features, and Outcomes of Infections with Carbapenem-resistantIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Epidemiological data on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [DISTRIBUTION OF CARBAPENEMASES IN TUNISIAN BURN PATIENTS].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2024
    Article
  7. Predictors of Mortality, Drug Resistance, and Determinants among Carbapenem-ResistantThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Epidemiological Analysis of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Strains in the Clinical Specimens of a Hospital].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  11. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (C/A) Resistant, Meropenem Sensitive KPC-ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intestinal Colonization Due to Carbapenem-ResistantIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2022
    Article
  19. The burden of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Hélène Nicolas-ChanoineService de Microbiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, F-92110, Clichy, France. marie-helene.nicolas-chanoine@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-9123
Marie ViganDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistic and Clinical Research, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, F-75018, Paris, France.
Cédric LaouénanINSERM and University Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, 16 rue Henri Huchard, F-75018, Paris, France.
Jérôme RobertCentre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, CIMI-Paris, Team E13 (Bacteriology), CR7, INSERM, U1135, Sorbonne Université, F-75013, Paris, France.
“E-carb Study Group”
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Ministère de la Sané (Programme de recherche clinique hospitalière NI12025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess characteristics associated with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), producing (CPE) or not producing (non-CPE) carbapenemase, among hospitalised patients in 2014-2016 in France. Case-patients with CRE were compared to two control populations. In multivariate analysis comparing 160 CRE cases to 160 controls C1 (patients with a clinical sample positive for carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae), five characteristics were linked to CRE: male gender (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.3-3.4), travel in Asia (OR = 10.0; 95% CI = 1.1-91.2) and hospitalisation in (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.3-4.4) or out of (OR = 4.4; 95% CI = 0.8-24.1) France in the preceding 12 months, infection in the preceding 3 months (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.5-5.9), and antibiotic receipt between admission and inclusion (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.0-3.3). In multivariate analysis comparing 148 CRE cases to 148 controls C2 [patients with culture-negative sample(s)], four characteristics were identified: prior infection (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.6-6.8), urine drainage (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.5-6.1) and mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.7; 95% CI = 1.1-13.0) during the current hospitalisation, and antibiotic receipt between admission and inclusion (OR = 6.6; 95% CI = 2.8-15.5). Univariate analyses comparing separately CPE cases to controls (39 CPE vs C1 and 36 CPE vs C2) and non-CPE cases to controls (121 non-CPE vs C1 and 112 non-CPE vs C2), concomitantly with comparison of CPE to non-CPE cases showed that only CPE cases were at risk of previous travel and hospitalisation abroad. This study shows that, among CRE, risk factors are different for CPE and non-CPE infection, and suggests that question patients about their medical history and lifestyle should help for early identification of patients at risk of CPE among patients with CRE.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCase-Control StudiesEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleFranceHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)Case-control-control studyMulticentre studyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30488368
OpenAlexW2903029894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.