ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2019
Integrating Retention Rates into Economic Analyses of Prevention Interventions.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engagement in a Preventive Intervention for Preadolescent Children in Foster Care: Considerations for Intervention Design.Child psychiatry and human development · 2023Trial
- Engaging Families in Voluntary Prevention Services to Reduce Future Child Abuse and Neglect: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021Trial
- Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.Trials · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence-based prevention interventions hold great promise for enhancing the well-being of individuals, families, and society. As these interventions are implemented in new contexts and at wider scales, policymakers and private sector organizations are increasingly interested in understanding the economic returns that programs produce through reductions of burden on public service systems, such as criminal justice and human services. Thus, it is important to ensure that economic models account for factors, such as retention, which are important when interventions are implemented in real-world contexts with selective populations and voluntary participation. Yet the field of prevention has provided little guidance to help researchers and policymakers analyze the economics of interventions so that estimates reflect the impact of implementation factors on intervention cost-effectiveness. This paper discusses the role retention plays in the economic efficiency of interventions when the prevention of child maltreatment is the primary motivation for funding these programs. We present a conceptual model to serve as a guide for explicit inclusion of retention rates when calculating cost estimates to be used in cost-effectiveness analysis. A case study is presented, demonstrating the variability in estimates dependent on the definition of retention and the estimated retention rate. The results underscore the importance of improving our understanding of factors underlying and related to retention, such as engagement, which may improve the precision of cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in applied settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30488333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.