Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488330›Full record

ReviewThe Psychiatric quarterly2019

Digitally Delivered Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Disorders: a Comprehensive Review.

Evgenia Stefanopoulou, David Lewis, Matthew Taylor, James Broscombe, Jan Larkin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Patients' and Therapists' Views of Integrated Online CBT for Depression.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evgenia StefanopoulouTurning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK. evgenia.stefanopoulou@turning-point.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0500-3828
David LewisTurning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK.
Matthew TaylorTurning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK.
James BroscombeTurning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK.
Jan LarkinTurning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK.
Turing Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital interventions for anxiety disorders have been well-researched over the past two decades. However, reviews to date have focused on internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), whereas other psychological interventions have received less attention. The aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of digitally delivered psychological therapies (CBT, Attention Bias Modification, Exposure Therapy, Applied Relaxation, Bibliotherapy, Psychodynamic Therapy, Mindfulness, Behavioural Stress Management, Counselling) compared with control conditions and/or other psychological interventions for anxiety disorders (Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Health Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Specific Phobias, Panic Disorder (PD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)]. 68 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. SAD was the anxiety disorder for which the most RCTs were conducted. Overall, findings support the effectiveness of iCBT for SAD; for the remaining interventions, although some RCTs indicated significant improvement (within groups) at post-treatment and/or follow up, between group findings were less consistent and overall, methodological differences across trials failed to provide strong supporting evidence. Finally, the level of therapist contact or expertise did not appear to affect much treatment effectiveness. Additional large, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to investigate further whether different digitally delivered psychological interventions are equally effective for anxiety disorders. Moreover, further studies are pertinent in order to examine the maintenance of therapy gains after the end of treatments and understand how these work [(e.g. the influence of therapist factors, user engagement and/or satisfaction, potential access barriers and treatments with diverse population groups (e.g. BME groups)].

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapyTelemedicineAnxietyDigitalInterventionsOnlineReview

Identifiers

PMID30488330
OpenAlexW2902333792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.