ReviewThe Psychiatric quarterly2019
Digitally Delivered Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Disorders: a Comprehensive Review.
Review in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial interventions for anxiety disorders in adults: evidence mapping and guideline appraisal.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Digital-Based Interventions for Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2024Pooled it
- Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness.Psychological medicine · 2023Pooled it
- A pre-post pilot feasibility study of the MindBia web-based nutrition intervention for individuals with severe mental illness: Study protocol.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Missing data in microrandomized trials: Challenges and opportunities.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Benefits and barriers associated with using cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Patients' and Therapists' Views of Integrated Online CBT for Depression.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Digital Lifestyle Interventions for Young People With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study Among Mental Health Care Professionals.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- The Impact of Digital Mental Health Services on Loneliness and Mental Health: Results from a Prospective, Observational Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Observational
- Article
- Psychotherapies and digital interventions for OCD in adults: What do we know, what do we need still to explore?Comprehensive psychiatry · 2023Review
- Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review.JMIR mental health · 2022Review
- Efficacy of intensive CBT telehealth for obsessive-compulsive disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders · 2022Article
- Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile-based health technology for smoking cessation: Mobile Anxiety Sensitivity Program.The British journal of clinical psychology · 2022Article
- Helpful explanatory models for somatoform symptoms (HERMES): study protocol of a randomised mixed-methods pilot trial.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Digital Interventions for PTSD Symptoms in the General Population: a Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital interventions for anxiety disorders have been well-researched over the past two decades. However, reviews to date have focused on internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), whereas other psychological interventions have received less attention. The aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of digitally delivered psychological therapies (CBT, Attention Bias Modification, Exposure Therapy, Applied Relaxation, Bibliotherapy, Psychodynamic Therapy, Mindfulness, Behavioural Stress Management, Counselling) compared with control conditions and/or other psychological interventions for anxiety disorders (Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Health Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Specific Phobias, Panic Disorder (PD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)]. 68 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. SAD was the anxiety disorder for which the most RCTs were conducted. Overall, findings support the effectiveness of iCBT for SAD; for the remaining interventions, although some RCTs indicated significant improvement (within groups) at post-treatment and/or follow up, between group findings were less consistent and overall, methodological differences across trials failed to provide strong supporting evidence. Finally, the level of therapist contact or expertise did not appear to affect much treatment effectiveness. Additional large, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to investigate further whether different digitally delivered psychological interventions are equally effective for anxiety disorders. Moreover, further studies are pertinent in order to examine the maintenance of therapy gains after the end of treatments and understand how these work [(e.g. the influence of therapist factors, user engagement and/or satisfaction, potential access barriers and treatments with diverse population groups (e.g. BME groups)].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.