Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488322›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2019

Comparative genomics for non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae isolates recovered from the Yangtze River Estuary versus V. cholerae representative isolates from serogroup O1.

Li Gong, Pan Yu, Huajun Zheng, Wenyi Gu, Wei He, Yadong Tang, Yaping Wang, Yue Dong, Xu Peng, Qunxin She and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virulence, Resistance, and Genomic Fingerprint Traits ofMicrobial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  4. The Impact of Water Intrusion on PathogenicInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Li GongKey Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), China Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Pan YuKey Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), China Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Huajun ZhengShanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Disease and Health Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wenyi GuShanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Disease and Health Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wei HeShanghai Hanyu Bio-lab, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yadong TangKey Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), China Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yaping WangKey Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), China Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yue DongUniversity of Oklahoma, Norman, USA.
Xu PengDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Qunxin SheDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lu XieShanghai Center for Bioinformation Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. xielu@scbit.org.
Lanming ChenKey Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), China Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. lmchen@shou.edu.cn.
Shanghai Ocean University · CNChinese National Human Genome Center · CNUniversity of Copenhagen · DKShanghai Center For Bioinformation Technology · CNUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.31271830National Natural Science Foundation of China No.31671946Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China No.17050502200Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, Shanghai, China No.B-9500-10-0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibriocholerae, which is autochthonous to estuaries worldwide, can cause human cholera that is still pandemic in developing countries. A number of V. cholerae isolates of clinical and environmental origin worldwide have been subjected to genome sequencing to address their phylogenesis and bacterial pathogenesis, however, little genome information is available for V. cholerae isolates derived from estuaries, particularly in China. In this study, we determined the complete genome sequence of V. cholerae CHN108B (non-O1/O139 serogroup) isolated from the Yangtze River Estuary, China and performed comparative genome analysis between CHN108B and other eight representative V. cholerae isolates. The 4,168,545-bp V. cholerae CHN108B genome (47.2% G+C) consists of two circular chromosomes with 3,691 predicted protein-encoding genes. It has 110 strain-specific genes, the highest number among the eight representative V. cholerae whole genomes from serogroup O1: there are seven clinical isolates linked to cholera pandemics (1937-2010) and one environmental isolate from Brazil. Various mobile genetic elements (such as insertion sequences, prophages, integrative and conjugative elements, and super-integrons) were identified in the nine V. cholerae genomes of clinical and environmental origin, indicating that the bacterium undergoes extensive genetic recombination via lateral gene transfer. Comparative genomics also revealed different virulence and antimicrobial resistance gene patterns among the V. cholerae isolates, suggesting some potential virulence factors and the rising development of resistance among pathogenic V. cholerae. Additionally, draft genome sequences of multiple V. cholerae isolates recovered from the Yangtze River Estuary were also determined, and comparative genomics revealed many genes involved in specific metabolism pathways, which are likely shaped by the unique estuary environment. These results provide additional evidence of V. cholerae genome plasticity and will facilitate better understanding of the genome evolution and pathogenesis of this severe water-borne pathogen worldwide.

Indexed as

BrazilChinaCholeraDNA Transposable ElementsEstuariesGenetic VariationGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyRiversSerogroupVibrio cholerae non-O1Vibrio cholerae O1DNA Transposable ElementsAntimicrobial resistanceComparative genomicsEstuaryMobile genetic elementsVibrio choleraeVirulence

Identifiers

PMID30488322
OpenAlexW2902485446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.