Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488273›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2019

Long-term safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study.

D C Noriega, F Rodrίguez-Monsalve, R Ramajo, I Sánchez-Lite, B Toribio, F Ardura

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Toolbox of Bone Consolidation for the Interventional Radiologist.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D C NoriegaHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain. noriega1970@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-1555
F Rodrίguez-MonsalveHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain.
R RamajoHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain.
I Sánchez-LiteHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain.
B ToribioHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain.
F ArduraHospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid, Calle Ramon y Cajal, 47008, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot monocenter study in 30 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures compared two vertebral augmentation procedures. Over a 3-year post-surgery follow-up, pain/disability/quality of life remained significantly improved with both balloon kyphoplasty and SpineJack® techniques, but the latter allowed better vertebral body height restoration/kyphosis correction.

introductionPatient follow-up rarely exceed 2 years in trials comparing vertebral augmentation procedures for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). This pilot, investigator-initiated, prospective study aimed to compare long-term results of SpineJack® (SJ) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). Preliminary results showed that SJ resulted in a better restoration of vertebral heights and angles, maintained over 12 months.

methodsThirty patients were randomized to SJ (n = 15) or BKP (n = 15). Clinical endpoints were analgesic consumption, back pain intensity (visual analog scale (VAS)), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and quality of life (EQ-VAS score). They were recorded preoperatively, at 5 days (except EQ-VAS), 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months post-surgery. Spine X-rays were taken 48 h prior to the procedure and 5 days, 6, 12, and 36 months after.

resultsClinical improvements were observed with both procedures over the 3-year period without significant inter-group differences, but the final mean EQ-5D

conclusionsIn this study, both techniques displayed very good long-term clinical efficiency and safety in patients with osteoporotic VCFs. Over the 3-year follow-up, vertebral body height restoration/kyphosis correction was better with the SpineJack® procedure.

Indexed as

AgedBack PainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, CompressionHumansKyphoplastyKyphosisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSpinal FracturesTreatment OutcomeBack painBalloon kyphoplastyOsteoporosisSpineJackVertebral augmentationVertebral compression fracture

Identifiers

PMID30488273
OpenAlexW4238521774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.