Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488269›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Validation study of ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements.

Victoria Asfour, Kayleigh Gibbs, Ana Sophia DaSilva, Ruwan Fernando, Guiseppe Alessandro Digesu, Vik Khullar

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria AsfourSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK. Mdb99va@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9022-6753
Kayleigh GibbsSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK.
Ana Sophia DaSilvaSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK.
Ruwan FernandoSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK.
Guiseppe Alessandro DigesuSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK.
Vik KhullarSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Paddington, W2 1NY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim was to validate ultrasound bladder wall thickness measurements. We scanned at three frequencies (5 MHz, 7 MHz and 9 MHz), using two techniques described in clinical practice and compared them with direct micrometre calliper measurements.

methodsBladder dome cadaver specimens were dissected from male and female cadavers. The direct micrometre calliper measurement under direct vision was used as the gold standard. We imaged using a Voluson E8 ultrasound scanner at three frequencies, using three probes: AB27D (2-7 MHz), RAB25D (2-5 MHz) and RIC50D (5-9 MHz). The specimens were scanned on two different occasions for intra-observer variability. A second operator, measured the samples again independently for the interobserver agreement. The specimens were gently placed onto a sheathed and gelled probe to avoid deformation. The method of scanning was the same for all the specimens, probes and operators.

resultsTwenty-five bladder dome specimens were assessed. The correlation of the ultrasound measurement to the direct measurement improved at higher ultrasound frequencies. Measuring from the inside of the serosal hyperechogenicity also increased the accuracy correlation with the direct measurement for all the frequencies tested.

conclusionsThis is the first study validating BWT ultrasound measurements against cadaveric bladder wall calliper measurements. Technology and technique affect accuracy, which is important in clinical practice. The use of 5-MHz probes is not recommended. The most accurate measurement was obtained using high-frequency ultrasound, where the measurement did not include the serosal brightness. These data suggest that high-frequency ultrasound should be used to assess BWT.

Indexed as

CadaverFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationOrgan SizeUltrasonographyUrinary BladderAccuracyBladder wall thicknessUltrasoundValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.