Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488143›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2019

Rapid Assessment Procedure Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) in Pragmatic Clinical Trials of Mental Health Services Implementation: Methods and Applied Case Study.

Lawrence A Palinkas, Douglas Zatzick

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07464236 (Partnering to Enhance Anal Health Communication and HIV-related Evidence-based Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07464236 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Partnering to Enhance Anal Health Communication and HIV-related Evidence-based Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2026 to 2030Enrolled8ConditionsHIV, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Anal Cancer Squamous CellArmsPEACHES 2.0 Implementation Strategies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence A PalinkasDepartment of Children, Youth and Families, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, 669 W. 34th Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0411, USA. Palinkas@usc.edu.
Douglas ZatzickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory SupplementU54AT007748 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2012 to 2017
$15.1M
A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and ComorbidityUH3MH106338 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZATZICK, DOUGLAS F · 2015 to 2018
$5.5M
Disseminating Organizational SBI Services (DO-SBIS) at Trauma CentersR01AA016102 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZATZICK, DOUGLAS F · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
A Policy Relevant US Trauma Care System Pragmatic Trial for PTSD and ComorbidityUH2MH106338 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZATZICK, DOUGLAS F · 2014 to 2014
$782k
National Institute of Health Office of the Director 1UH2MH106338-01NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT007748NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016102NIH Office of the Director 1UH2MH106338-01NIH Office of the Director 4UH3MH106338-02NIMH NIH HHS UH2 MH106338NIMH NIH HHS UH3 MH106338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services are increasingly being developed to establish comparative effectiveness, influence sustainable implementation, and address real world policy decisions. However, use of time and resource intensive qualitative methods in pragmatic trials may be inconsistent with the aims of efficiency and cost minimization. This paper introduces a qualitative method known as Rapid Assessment Procedure-Informed Clinical Ethnography (RAPICE) that combines the techniques of Rapid Assessment Procedures with clinical ethnography. A case study is presented to illustrate how RAPICE can be used to efficiently understand pragmatic trial implementation processes and associated real world policy implications.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnthropology, CulturalClinical Trials as TopicHumansMental Health ServicesQualitative ResearchTime FactorsClinical ethnographyImplementationPolicyPragmatic clinical trialsQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID30488143
PMCPMC7427407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.