Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488112›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Dual-energy CT in early acute pancreatitis: improved detection using iodine quantification.

Simon S Martin, Franziska Trapp, Julian L Wichmann, Moritz H Albrecht, Lukas Lenga, James Durden, Christian Booz, Thomas J Vogl, Tommaso D'Angelo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Current CT developments in imaging of pancreatic diseases].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon S MartinDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Franziska TrappDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Julian L WichmannDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. docwichmann@gmail.com.
Moritz H AlbrechtDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lukas LengaDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
James DurdenDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Christian BoozDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas J VoglDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tommaso D'AngeloDivision of Experimental and Translational Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of a dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based technique using iodine quantification and fat fraction analysis for the diagnosis of early acute pancreatitis

methodsIn this retrospective study, 45 patients (35 men and 10 women; mean age, 54.9 ± 14.0 years) with early acute pancreatitis were included. Serum lipase levels and follow-up examinations served as the reference standard. A matched control group (n = 45) was assembled for evaluation of material decomposition values of normal pancreatic parenchyma. Three blinded radiologists independently interpreted all cases on conventional grayscale DECT series. In addition, readers re-evaluated all cases by manually performing region-of-interest (ROI) measurements on pancreatic-phase DECT material density images of the head, body, and tail of each patient's pancreas. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal threshold for discriminating between inflammatory and normal pancreas parenchyma.

resultsDECT-based iodine density values showed significant differences between inflammatory (1.8 ± 0.3 mg/mL) and normal pancreatic parenchyma (2.7 ± 0.7 mg/mL) (p ≤ 0.01). Fat fraction measurements showed no significant differences (p = 0.08). The optimal iodine density threshold for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was 2.1 mg/mL with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 77%. Iodine quantification revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, significantly higher compared to standard image evaluation of the radiologists (AUC, 0.80; sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 82%) (p < 0.01).

conclusionDECT using iodine quantification allows for diagnosis of early acute pancreatitis with higher sensitivity compared to standard image evaluation. KEY POINTS: • Iodine density values showed significant differences between inflammatory and normal pancreatic parenchyma. • DECT using iodine quantification allows for diagnosis of early acute pancreatitis. • An iodine density of ≤ 2.1 mg/mL optimizes the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIodineMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPancreasPancreatitisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveContrast MediaIodineDiagnostic imagingIodineMultidetector computed tomographyPancreasPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID30488112
OpenAlexW2902610485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.