Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30488033›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018

Frontiers of Medical Micro/Nanorobotics:

Fernando Soto, Robert Chrostowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Treatment of lung diseasesMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  6. Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances of medical nanorobots for future cancer treatments.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando SotoDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Robert ChrostowskiTexas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of medical micro/nanorobotics holds considerable promise for advancing medical diagnosis and treatment due to their unique ability to move and perform complex task at small scales. Nevertheless, the grand challenge of the field remains in its successful translation towards widespread patient use. We critically address the frontiers of the current methodologies for

Indexed as

commercializationin vivomedical translational researchmicrorobotnanomedicinenanorobot

Identifiers

PMID30488033
PMCPMC6246686
OpenAlexW2898460285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.