Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487998›Full record

ArticleRMD open2018

Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study.

Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Yannick Allanore, Arthur Kavanaugh, Maya H Buch, Hendrik Schulze-Koops, Eugeniusz J Kucharz, Heike Woehling, Goran Babic, Johann Poetzl, Adanna Davis and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02638259 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Phase III Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety & Immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel®), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02638259 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Phase III Study to Demonstrate Equivalent Efficacy and to Compare Safety & Immunogenicity of GP2015 and Enbrel® (EU Authorized) in Patients With Moderate to Severe, Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSandozRan2015 to 2017Enrolled376ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsGP2015
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biosimilars versus biologics for inflammatory conditions.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marco Matucci-CerinicDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology AOUC, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Yannick AllanoreCochin Hospital, Rheumatology A Department, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Arthur KavanaughUC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
Maya H BuchUniversity of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-5642
Hendrik Schulze-KoopsDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Eugeniusz J KucharzMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Heike WoehlingHexal AG, a Sandoz company, Holzkirchen, Germany.
Goran BabicHexal AG, a Sandoz company, Holzkirchen, Germany.
Johann PoetzlHexal AG, a Sandoz company, Holzkirchen, Germany.
Adanna DavisSandoz Inc, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Arnd SchwebigHexal AG, a Sandoz company, Holzkirchen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo demonstrate the equivalent efficacy and compare the safety and immunogenicity of an etanercept biosimilar, GP2015, with reference etanercept (ETN) in patients with moderate-to-severe, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), characterised by an inadequate response to synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

methodsIn the EQUIRA study, eligible patients (n=376) were randomised 1: 1 to 50  mg GP2015 or ETN subcutaneously, once weekly, for 24 weeks (treatment period 1). Patients from both groups, with at least moderate European League Against Rheumatism response at week 24, received GP2015 up to week 48 (treatment period 2). All patients continued to receive concomitant methotrexate at a stable dose (10-25  mg/week) until end of the study. The 24-week results are presented here.

resultsEquivalent efficacy between GP2015 and ETN was demonstrated if the 95% CI for the difference in disease activity score 28-joint count C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) change from baseline to week 24 between treatment arms was contained within the prespecified equivalence margin range of -0.6 to 0.6. The least squares mean difference (GP2015-ETN) in change from baseline in DAS28-CRP up to week 24 was -0.07 (95% CI -0.26 to 0.12 [primary endpoint)]. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between GP2015 (43.5%) and ETN (49.5%). None of the GP2015-treated patients developed neutralising anti-drug antibodies (NAbs) whereas 1.6% and 0.6% of patients in ETN group were NAb positive at weeks 4 and 12, respectively.

conclusionIn patients with RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs, GP2015 demonstrated a similar efficacy and a comparable safety and immunogenicity profile with ETN.

trial registrationNCT02638259.

Indexed as

bioequivalencebiosimilaretanerceptGP2015rheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30487998
PMCPMC6242015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.