Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487981›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Intermittent systemic hypoxic-hyperoxic training for myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: first results from a single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

Denis S Tuter, Philippe Y Kopylov, Abram L Syrkin, Oleg S Glazachev, Roman N Komarov, Andrei I Katkov, Ljudmila P Severova, Ekaterina V Ivanova, Young Zhang, Hugo Saner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hypoxia as a medicine.Science translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Denis S TuterIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Philippe Y KopylovIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Abram L SyrkinIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg S GlazachevIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Roman N KomarovIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Andrei I KatkovIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Ljudmila P SeverovaIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina V IvanovaIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Young ZhangHarbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hugo SanerIE Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RUHarbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIP) provides protection against myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion injury during cardiac surgery, it is not widely used. Systemic intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic training (IHHT) may be a suitable alternative. Methods: This is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. 127 patients with ischaemic heart disease and indication for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery from the Cardiology Clinic IM Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University were randomly assigned to IHHT, IHHT-control or RIP. Primary endpoint was serum concentration of troponin I and lactate 2 and 24 hours after surgery. Results: Median value for troponin I 24 hours after surgery was 1.068 (0.388-1.397) ng/mL in the IHHT group and was significantly lower compared with IHHT-controls with 1.980 (1.068-3.239) ng/mL (p=0.012) and to the RIP group with 1.762 (1.288-2.186) ng/mL (p=0.029), while there was no significant difference between RIP and the IHHT-control. Serum lactate after surgery was 1.74 (1.23-2.04) mmol/L in the IHHT group and was also significantly lower compared with IHHT-controls with 2.10 (1.80-2.29) mmol/L (p=0.045) and RIP with 2.12 (1.91-2.33) mmol/L (p=0.032). No significant complications or serious adverse events were observed during IHHT. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The results of this first trial using IHHT for myocardial protection against perioperative ischaemic myocardial injury in patients undergoing CABG surgery are promising and further larger trials should be done with adequate power to detect clinical rather than surrogate marker benefits.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass surgeryhypoxic-hyperoxic trainingmyocardial injurymyocardial protectionremote ischemic preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID30487981
PMCPMC6241980
OpenAlexW2900376379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.