Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487876›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Motivational enhancement treatment in outpatient addiction centers: A multisite randomized trial.

Rodrigo Marín-Navarrete, Viviana E Horigian, María Elena Medina-Mora, Rosa E Verdeja, Elizabeth Alonso, Daniel J Feaster, José Fernández-Mondragón, Carlos Berlanga, Ricardo Sánchez-Huesca, Carlos Lima-Rodríguez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo Marín-NavarreteInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), México.
Viviana E HorigianUniversity of Miami, USA.
María Elena Medina-MoraInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), México.
Rosa E VerdejaUniversity of Miami, USA.
Elizabeth AlonsoUniversity of Miami, USA.
Daniel J FeasterUniversity of Miami, USA.
José Fernández-MondragónInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), México.
Carlos BerlangaInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), México.
Ricardo Sánchez-HuescaCentros de Integración Juvenil, México.
Carlos Lima-RodríguezConsejo Estatal Contra las Adicciones Puebla, México.
Ana De la Fuente-MartínInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), México.
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría · MXUniversity of Miami · USInstituto para la Atención y Prevención de las Adicciones · MX

Funding

The Florida Node Alliance of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA013720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel J Feaster, Viviana Elizabeth Horigian · 2015 to 2026
$50.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMotivational Enhancement Treatment in Spanish (METS) is a brief intervention aimed at resolving patient ambivalence towards behavior change that has demonstrated efficacy in substance use disorder treatment to reduce use and increase treatment engagement in different populations. In order to have evidence for its implementation in Mexico, a multi-site, randomized, two-arm, controlled clinical trial was conducted at three outpatient addiction treatment centers in the country to compare the effect of METS with Counseling as Usual (CAU).

methodOne hundred and twenty patients were randomized to receive three sessions of METS (

resultsResults associated both conditions with significant changes in substance use over, whereas there were no differences between conditions in substance use or in service utilization.

conclusionsFindings do not support the hypothesis that METS is more effective than CAU, but suggest that brief interventions at treatment initiation may improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceExperimental trialMéxicoMotivational interviewingSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID30487876
PMCPMC6236319
OpenAlexW2462863147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.