Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Comparative Analysis of the Nodule Transcriptomes of

Marco G Salgado, Robin van Velzen, Thanh Van Nguyen, Kai Battenberg, Alison M Berry, Daniel Lundin, Katharina Pawlowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Convergent evolution ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NADMicrobes and environments · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Evolutionary Aspects of Legume Nitrogen-Fixing Nodule Symbiosis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco G SalgadoDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robin van VelzenLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Thanh Van NguyenDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kai BattenbergDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Alison M BerryDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Daniel LundinCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Katharina PawlowskiDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SEUniversity of California, Davis · USGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two types of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses are known, rhizobial and actinorhizal symbioses. The latter involve plants of three orders, Fagales, Rosales, and Cucurbitales. To understand the diversity of plant symbiotic adaptation, we compared the nodule transcriptomes of

Indexed as

actinorhizadefensindivergent evolutionnitrogen-fixing root nodulesnitrogen metabolismNod factor receptorsubtilase

Identifiers

PMID30487804
PMCPMC6246699
OpenAlexW2900862729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.