ArticleJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition2018
Pethidine dose and female sex as risk factors for nausea after esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Article in Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mixed lesions in premalignant colorectal polyps.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2026Article
- Adenoma detection rates and complications of colonoscopy in patients aged 75 to 79 vs 70 to 74 years: Propensity score-matching study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Article
- Increasing trend ofJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2022Article
- Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- The simplified Kyoto classification score is consistent with the ABC method of classification as a grading system for endoscopic gastritis.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2021Article
- Article
- Clinical features of cardiac nodularity-like appearance induced byWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Adverse events associated with bidirectional endoscopy with midazolam and pethidine.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2020Article
- Small-caliber endoscopes are more fragile than conventional endoscopes.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nausea and vomiting after esophagogastroduodenoscopy have not been studied in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for post-endoscopic nausea. We performed a case-control study at the Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. Eighteen patients with post-endoscopic nausea and 190 controls without post-endoscopic nausea were analyzed. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with respect to patient age; sex; body height; body weight; the use of psychotropic drugs as baseline medications; and the dosing amounts of midazolam, pethidine, flumazenil and naloxone. On univariate analysis, post-endoscopic nausea was significantly related with patient age (odds ratio = 0.946); female sex (odds ratio = 10.85); body weight (odds ratio = 0.975); and the dose per kg body weight of pethidine (odds ratio = 53.03), naloxone (odds ratio = 1.676), and flumazenil (odds ratio = 1.26). On multivariate analysis, the dose per kg body weight of pethidine (odds ratio = 21.67,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.