Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487663›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2018

Reactivity of Amorphous Carbon Surfaces: Rationalizing the Role of Structural Motifs in Functionalization Using Machine Learning.

Miguel A Caro, Anja Aarva, Volker L Deringer, Gábor Csányi, Tomi Laurila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficient Machine Learning Prediction of Solvent-DependentJournal of computational chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modelling amorphous materialsChemical science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. X-ray Spectroscopy Fingerprints of Pristine and Functionalized Graphene.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel A CaroDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
Anja AarvaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
Volker L DeringerEngineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Gábor CsányiEngineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom.
Tomi LaurilaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Automation, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic atomistic studies of surface reactivity for amorphous materials have not been possible in the past because of the complexity of these materials and the lack of the computer power necessary to draw representative statistics. With the emergence and popularization of machine learning (ML) approaches in materials science, systematic (and accurate) studies of the surface chemistry of disordered materials are now coming within reach. In this paper, we show how the reactivity of amorphous carbon (a-C) surfaces can be systematically quantified and understood by a combination of ML interatomic potentials, ML clustering techniques, and density functional theory calculations. This methodology allows us to process large amounts of atomic data to classify carbon atomic motifs on the basis of their geometry and quantify their reactivity toward hydrogen- and oxygen-containing functionalities. For instance, we identify subdivisions of sp and sp

Identifiers

PMID30487663
PMCPMC6251556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.