Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487644›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019

Effect of early salvage radiotherapy at PSA < 0.5 ng/ml and impact of post-SRT PSA nadir in post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.

Dirk Bottke, Detlef Bartkowiak, Alessandra Siegmann, Reinhard Thamm, Dirk Böhmer, Volker Budach, Thomas Wiegel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  12. Detection rate, pattern of relapse and influence on therapeutic decision of PSMA PET/CT in patients affected by biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, a retrospective case series.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical utility ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk BottkeMVZ Klinikum Esslingen GmbH, Fachbereich Strahlentherapie, Esslingen, Germany. d.bottke@mvz-ke.de.
Detlef BartkowiakDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Alessandra SiegmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Reinhard ThammDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dirk BöhmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Volker BudachDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas WiegelDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEKlinikum Esslingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) offers a second chance of cure. European guidelines (EAU) recommend SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml. We analyze the efficacy of SRT given according to this recommendation and investigate the predictive power of the post-SRT PSA nadir.

methodsBetween 1998 and 2013, 301 patients of two university hospitals received SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml (median 0.192 ng/ml, IQR 0.110-0.300). Patients, who previously received androgen deprivation therapy, were excluded. All patients had 3D-conformal RT or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, n = 59) (median 66.6 Gy). The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Progression and overall survival were the endpoints.

resultsAfter SRT, 252 patients re-achieved an undetectable PSA. In univariate analysis, pre-RP PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml, pT3-4, Gleason score (GS) 7-10 or 8-10, negative surgical margins, post-RP PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml and post-SRT PSA nadir ≥ 0.1 ng/ml correlated unfavorably with post-SRT progression. In a multivariable Cox model, pT3-4, GS 7-10, negative margins and a pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml were significant risk factors. If the post-SRT PSA was added to the analysis, it dominated the outcome (HR = 9.00). Of the patients with a pre-SRT PSA < 0.2 ng/ml, only 9% failed re-achieving an undetectable PSA. Overall survival in these patients was 98% after 5.9 years compared to 91% in patients with higher pre-SRT PSA (Logrank p = 0.004).

conclusionsSRT at a PSA < 0.2 ng/ml correlates significantly with achieving a post-SRT undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/ml) and subsequently with improved freedom from progression. Given these overall favorable outcomes, whether additional androgen deprivation therapy is required for these men requires further study.

Indexed as

AgedCombined Modality TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative CareProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSalvage TherapyTime-to-TreatmentProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID30487644
OpenAlexW2902416715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.