Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487383›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Recreational Use of Spa Thermal Waters: Criticisms and Perspectives for Innovative Treatments.

Federica Valeriani, Lory Marika Margarucci, Vincenzo Romano Spica

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First report ofJournal of water and health · 2024
    Article
  2. Challenges of Spa Tourism in Andalusia: Experts' Proposed Solutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. To treat or not to treat? Misbeliefs in spa water disinfection.International journal of biometeorology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federica ValerianiPublic Health Unit, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome 00135, Italy. federica.valeriani@uniroma4.it.
Lory Marika MargarucciPublic Health Unit, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome 00135, Italy. lory.margarucci@tiscali.it.
Vincenzo Romano SpicaPublic Health Unit, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome 00135, Italy. vincenzo.romanospica@uniroma4.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural spa springs are diffused all over the world and their use in pools is known since ancient times. This review underlines the cultural and social spa context focusing on hygiene issues, public health guidelines and emerging concerns regarding water management in wellness or recreational settings. The question of the "untouchability" of therapeutic natural waters and their incompatibility with traditional disinfection processes is addressed considering the demand for effective treatments that would respect the natural properties. Available strategies and innovative treatments are reviewed, highlighting potentials and limits for a sustainable management. Alternative approaches comprise nanotechnologies, photocatalysis systems, advanced filtration. State of the art and promising perspectives are reported considering the chemical-physical component and the biological natural complexity of the spa water microbiota.

Indexed as

HygieneNatural SpringsDisinfectionHumansinnovative treatmentrecreational waterspathermal water

Identifiers

PMID30487383
PMCPMC6313452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.