ReviewOpen biology2018
A state-of-the-art perspective on microgliopathic pain.
Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuropathic pain and sarcopenia based on skeletal muscle mass assessment following lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a prospective observational study in Japan.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Microglia in Neuropathic Pain.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Therapeutic effects of peripherally administrated neural crest stem cells on pain and spinal cord changes after sciatic nerve transection.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
- IRF8 is crucial for the nicotine withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia in mice.Translational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Role of neuron and non-neuronal cell communication in persistent orofacial pain.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2019Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing XIST induce macrophage M2 polarization and improve neural stem cell homeostatic microenvironment, alleviating spinal cord injury.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute nociceptive pain is an undesirable feeling but has a physiological significance as a warning system for living organisms. Conversely, chronic pain is lacking physiological significance, but rather represents a confusion of nerve functions. The neuropathic pain that occurs after peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is perhaps the most important type of chronic pain because it is refractory to available medications and thus remains a heavy clinical burden. In recent decades, studies have shown that spinal microglia play a principal role in the alterations in synaptic functions evoking this pain. It is also clear that the P2X4 receptor (P2X4R), a subtype of ionotropic ATP receptors, is upregulated exclusively in spinal microglia after PNI and plays a key role in evoking neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain is caused by several conditions associated with activated microglia without nerve damage. 'Microgliopathic pain' is a new concept indicating such abnormal pain related to activated microglia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.