Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487260›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2018

Flight feather moult drives minimum daily heart rate in wild geese.

Steven J Portugal, Craig R White, Jonathan A Green, Patrick J Butler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heart rate as a measure of emotional arousal in evolutionary biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  2. A songbird adjusts its heart rate and body temperature in response to season and fluctuating daily conditions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven J PortugalSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK steve.portugal@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2438-2352
Craig R WhiteBiological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0200-2187
Jonathan A GreenSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.
Patrick J ButlerSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Monash University · AURoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterfowl undergo an annual simultaneous flight-feather moult that renders them flightless for the duration of the regrowth of the flight feathers. In the wild, this period of flightlessness could restrict the capacity of moulting birds to forage and escape predation. Selection might therefore favour a short moult, but feather growth is constrained and presumably energetically demanding. We therefore tested the hypothesis that for birds that undergo a simultaneous flight-feather moult, this would be the period in the annual cycle with the highest minimum daily heart rates, reflecting these increased energetic demands. Implantable heart rate data loggers were used to record year-round heart rate in six wild barnacle geese (

Indexed as

Heart RateMoltingAnimalsFeathersFemaleFlight, AnimalGeeseMaleNorwayavianenergeticsmetabolic rate

Identifiers

PMID30487260
PMCPMC6283923
OpenAlexW2902830993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.