Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487154›Full record

ArticlemSphere2018

Tetrasodium EDTA Is Effective at Eradicating Biofilms Formed by Clinically Relevant Microorganisms from Patients' Central Venous Catheters.

Fangning Liu, Satyender Hansra, Gordon Crockford, Wolfgang Köster, Brenda J Allan, Joseph M Blondeau, Chantal Lainesse, Aaron P White

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04559334 (Compassionate-Use of 4% T-EDTA Lock Solution for Central Venous Lines of Pediatric PN Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04559334 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Compassionate-Use of 4% T-EDTA Lock Solution for Central Venous Lines of Pediatric PN Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2020 to 2027Enrolled15ConditionsCentral Line Complication, Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)ArmsTetrasodium EDTA Catheter Lock Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Endodontic irrigants from a comprehensive perspective.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fangning LiuVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Satyender HansraVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Gordon CrockfordVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Wolfgang KösterVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brenda J AllanVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Joseph M BlondeauDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Royal University Hospital and Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Chantal LainesseSterileCare, Inc., Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Aaron P WhiteVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada aaron.white@usask.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2746-5265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are an essential component of modern health care. However, their prolonged use commonly results in microbial colonization, which carries the potential risk of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. These infections complicate the treatment of already sick individuals and cost the existing health care systems around the world millions of dollars. The microbes that colonize CVADs typically form multicellular biofilms that are difficult to dislodge and are resistant to antimicrobial treatments. Clinicians are searching for better ways to extend the working life span of implanted CVADs, by preventing colonization and reducing the risk of bloodstream infections. In this study, we analyzed 210 bacterial and fungal isolates from colonized CVADs or human bloodstream infections from two hospitals geographically separated in the east and west of Canada and screened the isolates for biofilm formation

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsCalcium Chelating AgentsCanadaCentral Venous CathetersEdetic AcidFungiHospitalsHumansAnti-Infective AgentsCalcium Chelating AgentsEdetic Acidantibiotic resistanceantimicrobialbiofilmscatheterscentral venous access devicesEDTAfungiGram-negativeGram-positiveminimum inhibitory concentration

Identifiers

PMID30487154
PMCPMC6262258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.