Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30487121›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2018

Emotion-in-Motion, a Novel Approach for the Modification of Attentional Bias: An Experimental Proof-of-Concept Study.

Lies Notebaert, Ben Grafton, Patrick Jf Clarke, Daniel Rudaizky, Nigel Tm Chen, Colin MacLeod

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lies NotebaertCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-4045
Ben GraftonCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9920-4278
Patrick Jf ClarkeCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-4479
Daniel RudaizkyCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-7382
Nigel Tm ChenSchool of Psychology, Curtin University, Bently, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-4843
Colin MacLeodCentre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-7339
The University of Western Australia · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with heightened anxiety vulnerability tend to preferentially attend to emotionally negative information, with evidence suggesting that this attentional bias makes a causal contribution to anxiety vulnerability. Recent years have seen an increase in the use of attentional bias modification (ABM) procedures to modify patterns of attentional bias; however, often this change in bias is not successfully achieved.

objectiveThis study presents a novel ABM procedure, Emotion-in-Motion, requiring individuals to engage in patterns of attentional scanning and tracking within a gamified, complex, and dynamic environment. We aimed to examine the capacity of this novel procedure, as compared with the traditional probe-based ABM procedure, to produce a change in attentional bias and result in a change in anxiety vulnerability.

methodsWe administered either an attend-positive or attend-negative version of our novel ABM task or the conventional probe-based ABM task to undergraduate students (N=110). Subsequently, participants underwent an anagram stressor task, with state anxiety assessed before and following this stressor.

resultsAlthough the conventional ABM task failed to induce differential patterns of attentional bias or affect anxiety vulnerability, the Emotion-in-Motion training did induce a greater attentional bias to negative faces in the attend-negative training condition than in the attend-positive training condition (P=.003, Cohen d=0.87) and led to a greater increase in stressor-induced state anxiety faces in the attend-negative training condition than in the attend-positive training condition (P=.03, Cohen d=0.60).

conclusionsOur novel, gamified Emotion-in-Motion ABM task appears more effective in modifying patterns of attentional bias and anxiety vulnerability. Candidate mechanisms contributing to these findings are discussed, including the increased stimulus complexity, dynamic nature of the stimulus presentation, and enriched performance feedback.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersattentional biasexperimental games

Identifiers

PMID30487121
PMCPMC6291684
OpenAlexW2889517600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.