Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486877›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Testing implementation facilitation of a primary care-based collaborative care clinical program using a hybrid type III interrupted time series design: a study protocol.

Amanda M Midboe, Steve Martino, Sarah L Krein, Joseph W Frank, Jacob T Painter, Michael Chandler, Allison Schroeder, Brenda T Fenton, Lara Troszak, Taryn Erhardt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda M MidboeCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, 795 Willow Rd (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. Amanda.Midboe@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-2507
Steve MartinoPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Sarah L KreinCenter for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joseph W FrankVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, HSR&D Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Jacob T PainterCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Michael ChandlerCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Allison SchroederVA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, HSR&D Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA.
Brenda T FentonPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Lara TroszakCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, 795 Willow Rd (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Taryn ErhardtCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, 795 Willow Rd (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Robert D KernsPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
William C BeckerPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
HSRD VA IK2 HX001914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDissemination of evidence-based practices that can reduce morbidity and mortality is important to combat the growing opioid overdose crisis in the USA. Research and expert consensus support reducing high-dose opioid therapy, avoiding risky opioid-benzodiazepine combination therapy, and promoting multi-modal, collaborative models of pain care. Collaborative care interventions that support primary care providers have been effective in medication tapering. We developed a patient-centered Primary Care-Integrated Pain Support (PIPS) collaborative care clinical program based on effective components of previous collaborative care interventions. Implementation facilitation, a multi-faceted and dynamic strategy involving the provision of interactive problem-solving and support during implementation of a new program, is used to support key organizational staff throughout PIPS implementation. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation facilitation strategy for implementing and sustaining PIPS in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The secondary aim is to examine the effect of the program on key patient-level clinical outcomes-transitioning to safer regimens and enhancing access to complementary and integrative health treatments. The tertiary aim is to determine the categorical costs and ultimate budget impact of PIPS implementation.

methodsThis multi-site study employs an interrupted time series, hybrid type III design to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation facilitation for a collaborative care clinical program-PIPS-in primary care clinics in three geographically diverse VHA health care systems (sites). Participants include pharmacists and allied staff involved in the delivery of clinical pain management services as well as patients. Eligible patients are prescribed either an outpatient opioid prescription greater than or equal to 90 mg morphine equivalent daily dose or a combination opioid-benzodiazepine regimen. They must also have an upcoming appointment in primary care. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will guide the mixed methods work across the formative evaluation phases and informs the selection of activities included in implementation facilitation. The RE-AIM framework will be used to assess Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of PIPS. DISCUSSION: This implementation study will provide important insight into the effectiveness of implementation facilitation to enhance uptake of a collaborative care program in primary care, which targets unsafe opioid prescribing practices.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorImplementation ScienceAnalgesics, OpioidEvidence-Based PracticeHumansInservice TrainingInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProgram EvaluationResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsWork EngagementAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesCollaborative careHybrid designImplementationOpioidsPharmacistPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30486877
PMCPMC6262952
OpenAlexW2902061306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.