Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486821›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2018

Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a systematic review.

Aukelien Scheffelaar, Nanne Bos, Michelle Hendriks, Sandra van Dulmen, Katrien Luijkx

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aukelien ScheffelaarNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands. A.Scheffelaar@nivel.nl.
Nanne BosNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michelle HendriksReinier van Arkel, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katrien LuijkxTilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 516012506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of a care relationship between a client and a care professional is seen as fundamental if high-quality care is to be delivered. This study reviews studies about the determinants of the quality of the client-professional relationship in long-term care.

methodsA systematic review was performed using the electronic databases of Medline, Psycinfo, CINAHL and Embase. The review focused on three client groups receiving long-term care: physically or mentally frail elderly, people with mental health problems and people with physical or intellectual disabilities. Included studies concern clients receiving inpatient or outpatient care and care professionals who provided recurring physical and supporting care for a long period of time. The studies we included contained primary empirical data, were written in English and were published in peer-reviewed journals. Data extraction was carried out by two researchers independently.

resultsThirty-two studies out of 11,339 initial hits met the inclusion criteria. In total, 27 determinants were revealed, six at the client level, twelve at the professional level, six between the client and care professional levels and three at the contextual level. The data analysis showed that most determinants were relevant in more than one client group.

conclusionsThis is the first review that looked at determinants of the quality of the care relationship for three large client groups receiving long-term care. It suggests that the current client group-specific focus in research and quality improvement initiatives for care relationships might not be needed. Care organisations can use the findings of this review as guidance on determinants to look for when mapping the quality of a care relationship in order to get a picture of specific points of attention for quality improvement.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareActivities of Daily LivingAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedAttitude to HealthChronic DiseaseEmotionsFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansLife Change EventsLong-Term CareMaleMental DisordersMotivationPatient Care TeamCare relationshipClient perspectiveClient-professional relationshipDeterminantsProfessional perspective, Long-term careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID30486821
PMCPMC6264609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.