SynthesisBMC health services research2018
Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The LIFE-ACE Framework of Building Therapeutic Relationships that Support Recovery in Japanese Community Mental Health: A Qualitative Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Registered nurse case managers' work experiences with a person-centered collaborative healthcare model: an interview study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Exploring differences in patient participation in simulated emergency cases in co-located and distributed rural emergency teams - an observational study with a randomized cross-over design.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Tensions between real-world practices and the digitalization paradigm for data-driven services in eldercare: observations from an ethnographic study in Sweden.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Greater than the sum of the parts: a qualitative content analysis of what constitutes a good treatment in the inpatient setting.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Addressing the Long-Term Care Crisis: Identifying Opportunities for Improvement Using Rapid Reviews.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2022Review
- Quality evaluation questionnaires - nursing homes (QEQ-NH); validation of questionnaires for measuring quality of care in nursing homes from various perspectives.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Lack of recognition at the societal level heightens turnover considerations among Nordic eldercare workers: a quantitative analysis of survey data.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Article
- Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Article
- Lessons learned from participatory research to enhance client participation in long-term care research: a multiple case study.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Correction to: Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a participatory study.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Themes Related to Experienced Quality of Care in Nursing Homes From the Resident's Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Synthesis.Gerontology & geriatric medicineReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe quality of a care relationship between a client and a care professional is seen as fundamental if high-quality care is to be delivered. This study reviews studies about the determinants of the quality of the client-professional relationship in long-term care.
methodsA systematic review was performed using the electronic databases of Medline, Psycinfo, CINAHL and Embase. The review focused on three client groups receiving long-term care: physically or mentally frail elderly, people with mental health problems and people with physical or intellectual disabilities. Included studies concern clients receiving inpatient or outpatient care and care professionals who provided recurring physical and supporting care for a long period of time. The studies we included contained primary empirical data, were written in English and were published in peer-reviewed journals. Data extraction was carried out by two researchers independently.
resultsThirty-two studies out of 11,339 initial hits met the inclusion criteria. In total, 27 determinants were revealed, six at the client level, twelve at the professional level, six between the client and care professional levels and three at the contextual level. The data analysis showed that most determinants were relevant in more than one client group.
conclusionsThis is the first review that looked at determinants of the quality of the care relationship for three large client groups receiving long-term care. It suggests that the current client group-specific focus in research and quality improvement initiatives for care relationships might not be needed. Care organisations can use the findings of this review as guidance on determinants to look for when mapping the quality of a care relationship in order to get a picture of specific points of attention for quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.