Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486812›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Using behaviour change and implementation science to address low referral rates in oncology.

Janet C Long, Deborah Debono, Rachel Williams, Elizabeth Salisbury, Sharron O'Neill, Elizabeth Eykman, Jordan Butler, Robert Rawson, Kim-Chi Phan-Thien, Stephen R Thompson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Referral Process Enhancement: Innovative Approaches and Best Practices.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Janet C LongCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. janet.long@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-682X
Deborah DebonoCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachel WilliamsNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth SalisburyNSW Pathology (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Sharron O'NeillSchool of Business, University of NSW, Campbell, ACT, Australia.
Elizabeth EykmanNSW Pathology (SEALS), St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Jordan ButlerNSW Pathology (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Robert RawsonAnatomical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Kim-Chi Phan-ThienSt George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Stephen R ThompsonNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melvin ChinNelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Natalie TaylorCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Prince of Wales Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUCancer Council NSW · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSt George Hospital · AUSutherland Hospital · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Institute NSW 9201500023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing surgery for bowel cancer now have a routine screening test to assess their genetic predisposition to this and other cancers (Lynch syndrome). A result indicating a high risk should trigger referral to a genetic clinic for diagnostic testing, information, and management. Appropriate management of Lynch syndrome lowers morbidity and mortality from cancer for patients and their family, but referral rates are low. The aim of this project was to increase referral rates for patients at high risk of Lynch syndrome at two Australian hospitals, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) Implementation approach.

methodsMultidisciplinary teams at each hospital mapped the referral process and discussed barriers to referral. A 12-month retrospective audit measured baseline referral rates. The validated Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire was administered to evaluate barriers using the TDF. Results were discussed in focus groups and interviews, and interventions co-designed, guided by theory. Continuous monitoring audits assessed change in referral rates.

resultsTeams (n = 8, 11) at each hospital mapped referral processes. Baseline referral rates were 80% (4/5) from 71 screened patients and 8% (1/14) from 113 patients respectively. The questionnaire response rate was 51% (36/71). Most significant barrier domains were: 'environmental context;' 'memory and decision making;' 'skills;' and 'beliefs about capabilities.' Focus groups and interviews with 19 healthcare professionals confirmed these domains as significant. Fifteen interventions were proposed considering both emerging and theory-based results. Interventions included: clarification of pathology reports, education, introduction of e-referrals, and inclusion of genetic status in documentation. Audits continued to December 2016 showing a change in pathology processes which increased the accuracy of screening. The referral rate remained low: 46% at Hospital A and 9% Hospital B. Results suggest patients who have their referral deferred for some reason are not referred later.

conclusionLynch syndrome is typical of low incidence problems likely to overwhelm the system as genomic testing becomes mainstream. It is crucial for health researchers to test methods and define generalizable solutions to address this problem. Whilst our approach did not improve referrals, we have deepened our understanding of barriers to referral and approaches to low frequency conditions.

Indexed as

AustraliaColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFacilities and Services UtilizationFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansImplementation ScienceMedical OncologyPatient SafetyReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBehaviour changeHereditary cancerImplementationPathologyReferralSystems changeTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID30486812
PMCPMC6263048
OpenAlexW2903413297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.