Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486783›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2018

Discovery and annotation of a novel transposable element family in Gossypium.

Hejun Lu, Xinglei Cui, Zhen Liu, Yuling Liu, Xingxing Wang, Zhongli Zhou, Xiaoyan Cai, Zhenmei Zhang, Xinlei Guo, Jinping Hua and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comprehensive review onFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Hejun LuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Xinglei CuiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Zhen LiuAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Yuling LiuAnyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Xingxing WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Zhongli ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Xiaoyan CaiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Zhenmei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Xinlei GuoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China.
Jinping HuaBeijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhiying MaKey Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources of Hebei province, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, Hebei, China.
Xiyin WangCenter for Genomics and Computational Biology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei, China.
Jinfa ZhangDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, 88003, USA.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 79409, USA.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. liufcri@163.com.
Kunbo WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China. wkbcri@163.com.
Cotton Research Institute · CNAnyang Institute of Technology · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNChina Agricultural University · CNHebei Agricultural University · CNNew Mexico State University · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

National Key Research and Development Plan 2016YFD0100203National Key Research and Development Plan 2016YFD0101401National Natural Science Foundation of China 31530053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an efficient cytogenetic technology to study chromosome structure. Transposable element (TE) is an important component in eukaryotic genomes and can provide insights in the structure and evolution of eukaryotic genomes.

resultsA FISH probe derived from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone 299N22 generated striking signals on all 26 chromosomes of the cotton diploid A genome (AA, 2x=26) but very few on the diploid D genome (DD, 2x=26). All 26 chromosomes of the A sub genome (At) of tetraploid cotton (AADD, 2n=4x=52) also gave positive signals with this FISH probe, whereas very few signals were observed on the D sub genome (Dt). Sequencing and annotation of BAC clone 299N22, revealed a novel Ty3/gypsy transposon family, which was named as 'CICR'. This family is a significant contributor to size expansion in the A (sub) genome but not in the D (sub) genome. Further FISH analysis with the LTR of CICR as a probe revealed that CICR is lineage-specific, since massive repeats were found in A and B genomic groups, but not in C-G genomic groups within the Gossypium genus. Molecular evolutionary analysis of CICR suggested that tetraploid cottons evolved after silence of the transposon family 1-1.5 million years ago (Mya). Furthermore, A genomes are more homologous with B genomes, and the C, E, F, and G genomes likely diverged from a common ancestor prior to 3.5-4 Mya, the time when CICR appeared. The genomic variation caused by the insertion of CICR in the A (sub) genome may have played an important role in the speciation of organisms with A genomes.

conclusionsThe CICR family is highly repetitive in A and B genomes of Gossypium, but not amplified in the C-G genomes. The differential amount of CICR family in At and Dt will aid in partitioning sub genome sequences for chromosome assemblies during tetraploid genome sequencing and will act as a method for assessing the accuracy of tetraploid genomes by looking at the proportion of CICR elements in resulting pseudochromosome sequences. The timeline of the expansion of CICR family provides a new reference for cotton evolutionary analysis, while the impact on gene function caused by the insertion of CICR elements will be a target for further analysis of investigating phenotypic differences between A genome and D genome species.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsGenome, PlantGossypiumIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSequence Analysis, DNATetraploidyDNA Transposable ElementsAllotetraploidEvolutionFISHGossypiumTransposable elementTy3/Gypsy

Identifiers

PMID30486783
PMCPMC6264596
OpenAlexW2903091157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.