ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018
Growth zone segmentation in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus sheds light on the evolution of insect segmentation.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nuclear targeting approach enables efficient transgenesis in the milkweed bugbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From candidate genes to omics: Unbiased approaches reshaping arthropod Evo-Devo.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- The development and evolution of arthropod tagmata.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Same rule, different genes:Science advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Single-cell sequencing suggests a conserved function of Hedgehog-signalling in spider eye development.EvoDevo · 2024Article
- Notch Signaling in Insect Development: A Simple Pathway with Diverse Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Dual Functions of labial Resolve the Hox Logic of Chelicerate Head Segments.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- The Nasonia pair-rule gene regulatory network retains its function over 300 million years of evolution.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Gene Editing and Genetic Control of Hemipteran Pests: Progress, Challenges and Perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Patterning with clocks and genetic cascades: Segmentation and regionalization of vertebrate versus insect body plans.PLoS genetics · 2021Review
- Annotation of segmentation pathway genes in the Asian citrus psyllid,GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2021Article
- High-Efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis of theGenetics · 2020Article
- The embryonic expression pattern of a second, hitherto unrecognized, paralog of the pair-rule gene sloppy-paired in the beetle Tribolium castaneum.Development genes and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Developing an integrated understanding of the evolution of arthropod segmentation using fossils and evo-devo.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Shifting roles ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019Article
- Establishment of the mayflyEvoDevo · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the best studied developmental processes is the Drosophila segmentation cascade. However, this cascade is generally considered to be highly derived and unusual, with segments being patterned simultaneously, rather than the ancestral sequential segmentation mode. We present a detailed analysis of the segmentation cascade of the milkweed bug Oncopletus fasciatus, an insect with a more primitive segmentation mode, as a comparison to Drosophila, with the aim of reconstructing the evolution of insect segmentation modes.
resultsWe document the expression of 12 genes, representing different phases in the segmentation process. Using double staining we reconstruct the spatio-temporal relationships among these genes. We then show knock-down phenotypes of representative genes in order to uncover their roles and position in the cascade.
conclusionsWe conclude that sequential segmentation in the Oncopeltus germband includes three slightly overlapping phases: Primary pair-rule genes generate the first segmental gene expression in the anterior growth zone. This pattern is carried anteriorly by a series of secondary pair-rule genes, expressed in the transition between the growth zone and the segmented germband. Segment polarity genes are expressed in the segmented germband with conserved relationships. Unlike most holometabolous insects, this process generates a single-segment periodicity, and does not have a double-segment pattern at any stage. We suggest that the evolutionary transition to double-segment patterning lies in mutually exclusive expression patterns of secondary pair-rule genes. The fact that many aspects of the putative Oncopeltus segmentation network are similar to those of Drosophila, is consistent with a simple transition between sequential and simultaneous segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.