Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486654›Full record

ReviewCartilage2021

Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

Brian J Cole, Michael L Redondo, Eric J Cotter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. RSC advances · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian J ColeDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael L RedondoDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eric J CotterDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2206-8754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this article is to review the orthopedic literature regarding patient understanding of articular cartilage disease, interpret literature reporting patient expectations for surgical management of articular cartilage injuries of the knee, and review patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction with management of these injuries.

designA retrospective review of the current literature using the PubMed database (1980-current) was performed on July 15, 2017. The search terms used were "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage." All searches were filtered to human studies and English language only and were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Studies not relevant to articular cartilage injury and/or surgical management in the knee were excluded. Additional references were found by backtracing references from obtained articles.

resultsThe published study search results for the terms: "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage" displayed a total of 873 studies. Two independent reviewers screen all studies A total of 50 published studies were relevant and included.

conclusionThe subjective and objective clinical outcomes reported are inconsistently obtained resulting in difficulty drawing comparisons between studies. While the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction has yet to be well developed, authors have reported patient and injury specific variables associated with superior and inferior outcomes. In conclusion, more work is needed to correlate patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for cartilage treatments with preoperative expectations and health literacy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAdultCartilage, ArticularFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleOrthopedic ProceduresPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionRetrospective Studiesarticular cartilagekneepatient expectationspatient-reported outcomespatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30486654
PMCPMC7970381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.