ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper addresses the automated detection of microcalcification clusters from mammogram images by enhanced preprocessing operations on digital mammograms for automated extraction of breast tissue from background, removing artefacts occurring during image registration using X-rays, followed by fractal analysis of suspicious regions. Identification of breast of either left or right and realigning them to a standard position forms a primitive step in preprocessing of mammograms. As the next step in the process, pectoral muscles are separated. Suspicious regions of microcalcifications are identified and are subjected to further analysis of classifying it as benign or malignant. Texture features are representative of its malignancy and fractal analysis was carried out on extracted suspicious regions for its texture features. Principal Component Analysis was carried out to extract optimal features. Ten features were found to be an optimal number of reduced texture features without compromising on classification accuracy. Scaled conjugate Gradient Back propagation network was used for classification using reduced texture features obtained from PCA analysis. By varying hidden layer neurons, accuracy of results achieved by proposed methods is analysed and is calculated to reach maximum accuracy with an optimal level of 15 neurons. Accuracy of 96.3% was achieved with 10 fractal features as input to neural network and 15 hidden layer neurons in neural network designed. The design of architecture is finalised with maximised accuracy for labelling microcalcification clusters as benign or malignant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.