Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486509›Full record

ArticleCancers2018

Back to the Future? The Fallopian Tube, Precursor Escape and a Dualistic Model of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis.

T Rinda Soong, David L Kolin, Nathan J Teschan, Christopher P Crum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tubal epithelial alterations: evolving concepts.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. BRCA1/2 and Endometrial Cancer Risk: Implications for Management.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Increase of fallopian tube and decrease of ovarian carcinoma: fact or fake?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T Rinda SoongDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. tsoong@uw.edu.
David L KolinDepartment of Pathology, Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. dkolin@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-6525
Nathan J TeschanDepartment of Pathology, Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nteschan@bwh.harvard.edu.
Christopher P CrumDepartment of Pathology, Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. ccrum@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-6525
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs OC130500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning with the discovery of the

Indexed as

fallopian tubehigh grade serous carcinomap53 signatureprecursorSEE-FIMTP53

Identifiers

PMID30486509
PMCPMC6316244
OpenAlexW2897901911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.