ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Strategies for Promoting the Medical Device Industry in Korea: An Analytical Hierarchy Process Analysis.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving maintenance efficiency and controlling costs in healthcare institutions through advanced analytical method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial structure and organization of the medical device industry urban network in China: evidence from specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative firms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Spatial networks of China's specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative medical device firms based on parent-subsidiary contacts: implications for regional health policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Innovation networks in the advanced medical equipment industry: supporting regional digital health systems from a local-national perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Leveraging Industry 4.0 for marketing strategies in the medical device industry of emerging economies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- How to calculate the life cycle of high-risk medical devices for patient safety.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Review on people's trust on home use medical devices during Covid-19 pandemic in India.Health and technology · 2022Review
- Innovative Culture and Firm Performance of Medical Device Companies: Mediating Effects of Investment in Education and Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Key Factors Identification and Risk Assessment for the Stability of Deep Surrounding Rock in Coal Roadway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the medical device industry in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and identifies the key strategies and general directions for promoting this industry through analytical hierarchy process (AHP). It is based on discussions of the key issues with specialists such as doctors, medical device companies, hospital staff, professors, and government agencies in the medical device industry. A total of 18 responses were obtained from the survey, and an analysis was conducted on the results. Among the medical device strategies identified by the surveyed specialists, clarifying the application of regulations (access strategy), increasing R&D investment for the technological development of medical devices (expansion strategy), and increasing support for global market expansion (infrastructure expansion strategy) were found to have the highest priority. Based on the above, we suggest key strategies and directions for promoting the medical device industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.