Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30486228›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2018

On the Design of Broad-Based Neuropsychological Test Batteries to Assess the Cognitive Abilities of Individuals with Down Syndrome in the Context of Clinical Trials.

Ines A Basten, Richard Boada, Hudson G Taylor, Katherine Koenig, Veridiana L Barrionuevo, Ana C Brandão, Alberto C S Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating working memory outcome measures for children with Down syndrome.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ines A BastenDivision of Neurology and Epilepsy, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. bastenines@gmail.com.
Richard BoadaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Richard.Boada@childrenscolorado.org.
Hudson G TaylorCenter for Biobehavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital Research Institute and The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA. hudson.taylor@nationwidechildrens.org.
Katherine KoenigDepartment of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. koenigk@ccf.org.
Veridiana L BarrionuevoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05652, Brazil. veridianaleiva@yahoo.com.br.
Ana C BrandãoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05652, Brazil. ana.cbrandao@einstein.br.
Alberto C S CostaDivision of Neurology and Epilepsy, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Alberto.Costa@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-1190

Funding

ALANA USA Foundation 200381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetically-defined cause of intellectual disability. Neurodevelopmental deficits displayed by individuals with DS are generally global, however, disproportionate deficits in cognitive processes that depend heavily on the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are also well documented. Additionally, DS is associated with relative strengths in visual processing and visuospatial short-term memory, and weaknesses in the verbal domain. Although reports of pharmacological rescuing of learning and memory deficits in mouse models of DS abound in the literature, proving the principle that cognitive ability of persons with DS can be boosted through pharmacological means is still an elusive goal. The design of customized batteries of neuropsychological efficacy outcome measures is essential for the successful implementation of clinical trials of potential cognitive enhancing strategies. Here, we review the neurocognitive phenotype of individuals with DS and major broad-based test batteries designed to quantify specific cognitive domains in these individuals, including the one used in a pilot trial of the drug memantine. The main goal is to illustrate the essential considerations in planning trials to enhance cognitive functions in individuals with DS, which should also have implications for the design of similar studies in individuals with other forms of intellectual disability.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedown syndromeepisodic memoryexecutive functionhippocampal deficitsmemantineneurocognitive phenotypeNMDA receptorworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30486228
PMCPMC6315396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.