ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2018
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induced by Microencapsulated Chondrocytes on Repairing of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Bench to Bedside: Translational Barriers in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tissue engineering strategies for treating intervertebral disc degeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: Bridging the gap between preclinical promise and clinical potential.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Review
- Icariin regulates stem cell migration for endogenous repair of intervertebral disc degeneration by increasing the expression of chemotactic cytokines.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2022Article
- Application of stem cells in the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Crosstalk Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Chondrocytes: The Hidden Therapeutic Potential for Cartilage Regeneration.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- Hydrostatic Pressure Modulates Intervertebral Disc Cell Survival and Extracellular Matrix Homeostasis via Regulating Hippo-YAP/TAZ Pathway.Stem cells international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells induced by microencapsulated chondrocytes on repairing of intervertebral disc degeneration.
methodsRabbit chondrocytes and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) were derived. Chondrocytes were microencapsulated by a microcapsule generator to produce microencapsulated chondrocytes (MEC). MSC were then co-cultured with MEC (MSC-MEC) and the properties and the therapeutic effects on repairing of intervertebral disc degeneration were studied. For the in vitro study, cell proliferation, type II collagen, and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) were studied. The MSC induced by chondrocytes in the Transwell system (MSC-MLC) and pure MSC were used as the control group. For the in vivo studied, MSC-MEC were implanted into the intervertebral disc degenerated (IDD) models, and the radiological images, biomechanical properties, collagen II, and histology of the discs were studied. The IDD, MSC, and MSC-MLC groups were used as the control group.
resultsIn the in vitro study, no significant differences were found among the three groups, indicating that the microcapsule co-culture system will not affect the proliferation of MSC. The type II collagen quantity secreted by MSC-MEC was 23.57 ± 2.46 ng/μL, which was more than for MSC-MLC (15.14 ± 2.31 ng/μL) and MSC groups (4.17 ± 1.23 ng/μL, all P < 0.025). GAG secreted by MSC-MEC was 0.184 ± 0.006 mg/well, which was more than for the MSC-MLC (0.151 ± 0.011 mg/well) and MSC groups (0.023 ± 0.002 mg/well, all P < 0.025). In the in vivo study, no obvious degenerative or protrusive disc was found in the MSC-MEC group, while protrusive discs could be found in the MSC-MLC group, and both degenerative and protrusive discs were found in MSC and IDD groups, which indicated that the reparative effects of MSC-MEC on degenerated discs were better than for the control groups. Biomechanical properties of discs in the MSC-MEC group were maintained at all four time points (2nd, 4th, 8th, and 16th week after implantation). The compressive strength (CS) and the elastic modulus (EM) of MSC and IDD groups were consistently decreased. The CS of the MSC-MLC group was increased in the 4th week but decreased again in the 8th week, while the EM of the MSC-MLC group consistently decreased. Western blot results indicated that discs of the MSC-MEC group had more collagen II, which is an important component of discs. Histology staining showed that the nucleus pulposus of MSC-MEC was complete; no obvious fragment of component loss was found, while those of MSC-MLC, MSC, and IDD groups were widened, broken, and hollow.
conclusionThe microencapsulation method for half-contact co-culturing improves the differentiation extent of MSC, and MSC induced by chondrocytes could also be used for treatment of IDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.