Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30485373›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Giant panda twin rearing without assistance requires more interactions and less rest of the mother-A case study at Vienna Zoo.

Martina Heiderer, Carmen Westenberg, Desheng Li, Hemin Zhang, Doris Preininger, Eveline Dungl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The isolation and culture of giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) breast milk cells.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina HeidererTiergarten Schönbrunn GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-7763
Carmen WestenbergTiergarten Schönbrunn GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Desheng LiWolong Nature Reserve Administration Bureau, Dujangyan City, PR China.
Hemin ZhangWolong Nature Reserve Administration Bureau, Dujangyan City, PR China.
Doris PreiningerTiergarten Schönbrunn GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Eveline DunglTiergarten Schönbrunn GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The giant pandas' (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) reproductive strategy is unique among mammals. Yet there are characteristics of giant panda behaviour we do not fully understand. Probably one of the least understood is the assumption that in captivity virtually all giant panda females rear only one cub when twins are born and abandon the other if given the chance. So far, only two females have raised twins simultaneously, but just with intensive human assistance. This case-study marks the first successful rearing of giant panda twins in captivity entirely by the mother. Using video data for detailed behavioural observations, we provide the first behavioural assessment of a giant panda female raising two cubs simultaneously without direct human assistance or disturbance. We compared the maternal behaviour during the denning period of twin cubs raised in 2016 with two singleton cubs born 2007 and 2010. YANG YANG, the dam, rested less and interacted more with the twins than with the singletons in the first month postpartum and invested a greater part of her daily time budget on rearing the twins. We discuss potential favourable factors for the autonomous twin-rearing of a female giant panda, which could serve as a model for similar efforts elsewhere.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, ZooAustriaFemaleMaleReproductionUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID30485373
PMCPMC6261581
OpenAlexW2903452814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.