Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30485331›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Evaluation of flicker induced hyperemia in the retina and optic nerve head measured by Laser Speckle Flowgraphy.

Klemens Fondi, Ahmed M Bata, Nikolaus Luft, Katarzyna J Witkowska, René M Werkmeister, Doreen Schmidl, Matthias Bolz, Leopold Schmetterer, Gerhard Garhöfer

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Retinal Neurovascular Coupling in Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Klemens FondiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ahmed M BataDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-762X
Nikolaus LuftKepler University Clinic, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Katarzyna J WitkowskaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
René M WerkmeisterCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Doreen SchmidlDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias BolzKepler University Clinic, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Leopold SchmettererDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard GarhöferDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-5669
Medical University of Vienna · ATJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe coupling between neural activity and blood flow is a physiological key principle of ocular blood flow regulation. The current study was performed to investigate whether Laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG), a commercially available technique for measuring blood flow, is capable to assess flicker-induced haemodynamic changes in the retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) circulation.

methodsTwenty healthy subjects were included in this cross sectional study. A commercial LSFG instrument was used to measure blood flow at the ONH as well as in retinal vessels before and during stimulation with flickering light. Mean blur rate (MBR), a measure of relative blood flow velocity, was obtained for the ONH and relative flow volume (RFV) a measure of relative blood flow of the respective retinal vessels.

resultsStimulation with flicker light increased ONH MBR by +17.5%±6.6% (p<0.01). In retinal arteries, flicker stimulation led an increase of +23.8±10.0% (p<0.05) in total RFV. For retinal veins, an increase of +23.1%±11.0 (p<0.05) in total RFV was observed during stimulation. A higher response was observed in nasal RFV compared to temporal RFV in retinal arteries (nasal: +28.9%±20.0%; temporal: +20.4%±17.6%, p<0.05) and veins (nasal: +28.3%±19.6%; temporal +17.8%±18.9%, p<0.05).

conclusionAs shown previously with other techniques, flicker stimulation leads to an increase in retinal and optic nerve head blood flow. Our results indicate that LSFG is an appropriate method for the quantification of retinal and ONH blood flow during visual stimulation and may be used as a non-invasive, easy to use tool to assess neuro-vascular coupling in humans.

Indexed as

HyperemiaLaser-Doppler FlowmetryOptic NervePhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal ArteryAdultBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30485331
PMCPMC6261588
OpenAlexW2902755525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.