ArticlePloS one2018
Zebrafish larvae show negative phototaxis to near-infrared light.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermal lensing effects in two-photon light-sheet microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Nanoarchaeosomes for synergistic photochemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiphoton Neurophotonics: Recent Advances in Imaging and Manipulating Neuronal Circuits.ACS photonics · 2025Review
- Protocol to perform ex vivo electroretinography on adult zebrafish.STAR protocols · 2025Article
- Extremely low frequency magnetic field distracts zebrafish from a visual cognitive task.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Is the diel cycle of routine metabolic rate in mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) affected by near-infrared lighting used for visualizing behavior of fishes at night?Journal of fish biology · 2024Article
- Light wavelength modulates search behavior performance in zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Key HPI axis receptors facilitate light adaptive behavior in larval zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Influence of Methylene Blue or Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Larval Zebrafish Development and Behavior.Zebrafish · 2023Article
- Algorithms underlying flexible phototaxis in larval zebrafish.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Toxic effects of a mancozeb-containing commercial formulation at environmental relevant concentrations on zebrafish embryonic development.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Inconsistencies in variable reporting and methods in larval zebrafish behavioral assays.Neurotoxicology and teratologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zebrafish larvae (Danio rerio) are among the most used model species to test biological effects of different substances in biomedical research, neuroscience and ecotoxicology. Most tests are based on changes in swimming activity of zebrafish larvae by using commercially available high-throughput screening systems. These systems record and analyse behaviour patterns using visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) light sources, to simulate day (VIS) and night (NIR) phases, which allow continuous recording of the behaviour using a NIR sensitive camera. So far, however, the sensitivity of zebrafish larvae to NIR has never been tested experimentally, although being a critical piece of information for interpreting their behaviour under experimental conditions. Here, we investigated the swimming activity of 96 hpf (hours post fertilization) and 120 hpf zebrafish larvae under light sources of NIR at 860 nm and at 960 nm wavelength and under VIS light. A thermal source was simultaneously presented opposite to one of the light sources as control. We found that zebrafish larvae of both larval stages showed a clear negative phototactic response towards 860 nm NIR light and to VIS light, but not to 960 nm NIR light. Our results demonstrated that zebrafish larvae are able to perceive NIR at 860 nm, which is almost identical to the most commonly used light source in commercial screening systems (NIR at 850 nm) to create a dark environment. These tests, however, are not performed in the dark from the zebrafish´s point of view. We recommend testing sensitivity of the used test organism before assuming no interaction with the applied light source of commonly used biosensor test systems. Previous studies on biological effects of substances to zebrafish larvae should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.