Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30485290›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Patterns of brown bear damages on apiaries and management recommendations in the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain.

Javier Naves, Andrés Ordiz, Alberto Fernández-Gil, Vincenzo Penteriani, María Del Mar Delgado, José Vicente López-Bao, Eloy Revilla, Miguel Delibes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating Intraspecific Attacks in Brown Bears (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Javier NavesDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-0288
Andrés OrdizFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Alberto Fernández-GilDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Seville, Spain.
Vincenzo PenterianiResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University-Campus Mieres, Mieres, Spain.
María Del Mar DelgadoResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University-Campus Mieres, Mieres, Spain.
José Vicente López-BaoResearch Unit of Biodiversity (UMIB, UO-CSIC-PA), Oviedo University-Campus Mieres, Mieres, Spain.
Eloy RevillaDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Seville, Spain.
Miguel DelibesDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large carnivores are often persecuted due to conflict with human activities, making their conservation in human-modified landscapes very challenging. Conflict-related scenarios are increasing worldwide, due to the expansion of human activities or to the recovery of carnivore populations. In general, brown bears Ursus arctos avoid humans and their settlements, but they may use some areas close to people or human infrastructures. Bear damages in human-modified landscapes may be related to the availability of food resources of human origin, such as beehives. However, the association of damage events with factors that may predispose bears to cause damages has rarely been investigated. We investigated bear damages to apiaries in the Cantabrian Mountains (Spain), an area with relatively high density of bears. We included spatial, temporal and environmental factors and damage prevention measures in our analyses, as factors that may influence the occurrence and intensity of damages. In 2006-2008, we located 61 apiaries, which included 435 beehives damaged in the study area (346 km2). The probability of an apiary being attacked was positively related to both the intensity of the damage suffered the year before and the distance to the nearest damaged apiary, and negatively related to the number of prevention measures employed as well as the intensity of the damage suffered by the nearest damage apiary. The intensity of damage to apiaries was positively related to the size of the apiary and to vegetation cover in the surroundings, and negatively related to the number of human settlements. Minimizing the occurrence of bear damages to apiaries seems feasible by applying and maintaining proper prevention measures, especially before an attack occurs and selecting appropriate locations for beehives (e.g. away from forest areas). This applies to areas currently occupied by bears, and to neighbouring areas where dispersing individuals may expand their range.

Indexed as

BeekeepingConservation of Natural ResourcesUrsidaeAnimalsBehavior, AnimalEnvironmentPlantsProbabilitySpainSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30485290
PMCPMC6261554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.