Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30485153›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Greg D Field, Valerie Uzzell, E J Chichilnisky, Fred Rieke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Greg D FieldDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5942-2679
Valerie UzzellSystems Neurobiology Laboratories, Salk Institute for Biological Studies , La Jolla, California.
E J ChichilniskyStanford University, Departments of Neurosurgery and Ophthalmology , Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-0248
Fred RiekeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Duke University · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF SINGLE PHOTON DETECTIONR01EY011850 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Light adaptation and circadian modulation of parallel processing in retinaR01EY024567 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FIELD, GREGORY DARIN · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Retinal interactions between rod and cone signalsR01EY028111 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
ENSEMBLE CODING OF VISUAL INFORMATION IN THE RETINAR01EY013150 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI CHICHILNISKY, EDUARDO J · 2000 to 2004
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011850NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013150NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024567NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory receptor noise corrupts sensory signals, contributing to imperfect perception and dictating central processing strategies. For example, noise in rod phototransduction limits our ability to detect light, and minimizing the impact of this noise requires precisely tuned nonlinear processing by the retina. But detection sensitivity is only one aspect of night vision: prompt and accurate behavior also requires that rods reliably encode the timing of photon arrivals. We show here that the temporal resolution of responses of primate rods is much finer than the duration of the light response and identify the key limiting sources of transduction noise. We also find that the thermal activation rate of rhodopsin is lower than previous estimates, implying that other noise sources are more important than previously appreciated. A model of rod single-photon responses reveals that the limiting noise relevant for behavior depends critically on how rod signals are pooled by downstream neurons. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Many studies have focused on the visual system's ability to detect photons, but not on its ability to encode the relative timing of detected photons. Timing is essential for computations such as determining the velocity of moving objects. Here we examine the timing precision of primate rod photoreceptor responses and show that it is more precise than previously appreciated. This motivates an evaluation of whether scotopic vision approaches limits imposed by rod temporal resolution.

Indexed as

PhotonsAnimalsCompulsive BehaviorLinear ModelsMacaca fascicularisNeural Networks, ComputerNonlinear DynamicsPapio anubisPhotic StimulationRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRhodopsinSensory ThresholdsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsTissue Culture TechniquesVision, OcularRhodopsinphototransductionscotopicsignal processingvision

Identifiers

PMID30485153
PMCPMC6383662
OpenAlexW2890558273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.