ArticleJAMA psychiatry2019
Trends in Serious Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of US Adults.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychotherapy and Antidepressant Use After the US Preventive Services Task Force-Recommended Depression Screening.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Breaking Barriers: Understanding Mental Health Care Disparities in Latino and African American Populations.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Trends and patterns of medical stimulant use by US adults.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Capacity, Financing, and Structural Strain in Mental Health Care in the United States: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Exploring psychiatrists' perspectives on supporting parents with mental health Challenges: A mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Mental health care utilization among middle-aged and older U.S. adults: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Assessing the Incremental Health Care Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Serious Psychological Distress by Living Arrangements Among Older Adults.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025Article
- Trends and Disparities in Mental Health Use Among Asian American Sub-groups, 2013-2019.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Perceived access to gender-affirming care, completion of gender-affirming medical interventions, and psychological distress among transgender women of color: the TURNNT cohort study.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Observational
- A New CAHPS Measure of Patient Experiences With Mental Health and Substance Use Care.Health services research · 2025Article
- Key questions to ask before implementing a Digital Mental Health Service (DMHS): A primer for policy makers.Internet interventions · 2025Review
- Trends and disparities in health status and health care in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of a Digital Coaching Program for Improving Mental Well-Being and Emotional Intelligence: Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Medicare Eligibility and Health Care Use Among Adults With Psychological Distress.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Enrollment in Medicare is associated with fewer outpatient mental healthcare visits among those with mental health symptoms.Health services research · 2025Article
- Trends in Bundled Outpatient Behavioral Health Services in VA-Direct Versus VA-Purchased Care.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- School Violence Exposure as an Adverse Childhood Experience: Protocol for a Nationwide Study of Secondary Public Schools.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Adolescent utilization of eating disorder higher level of care: roles of family-based treatment adherence and demographic factors.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Prevalence and determinants of opioid use disorder among long-term opiate users in Golestan Cohort Study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Trends of mental health care utilization among US adults from 1999 to 2018.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Reports of a recent increase in US outpatient mental health care raise questions about whether it has been driven by rising rates of psychological distress and whether mental health treatment has become either more or less focused on people with higher levels of distress. Objective: To characterize national trends in serious psychological distress and trends in outpatient mental health service use by adults with and without serious psychological distress. Design, Setting, and Participants: The 2004-2005, 2009-2010, and 2014-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS) were nationally representative surveys taken in US households. The analysis was limited to participants 18 years or older. Dates of this analysis were February 2018 to April 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual national trends in the percentages of adults with serious psychological distress (Kessler 6 scale score ≥13), outpatient mental health service use (outpatient visit with a mental disorder diagnosis, psychotherapy visit, or psychotropic medication), and type of psychotropic medication use (antidepressants, anxiolytics/sedatives, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and stimulants). Age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios of the associations of survey period with the odds of serious psychological distress, outpatient mental health service use, and outpatient mental health service use were stratified by level of psychological distress. Results: The analysis involved 139 862 adult participants from the 2004-2005, 2009-2010, and 2014-2015 MEPS, including 51.67% women, 48.33% men, 67.11% white adults, and 32.89% nonwhite adults, with an overall mean (SE) age of 46.41 (0.14) years. Serious psychological distress declined overall from 4.82% (2004-2005) to 3.71% (2014-2015), including significant declines among young (3.94% to 3.07%), middle-aged (5.52% to 4.36%), and older adults (5.24% to 3.79%); men (3.94% to 3.09%) and women (5.64% to 4.29%); and major racial/ethnic groups (white, 4.52% to 3.82%; African American, 5.12% to 3.64%; Hispanic, 6.03% to 3.55%; and other, 5.22% to 3.26%). Overall, the percentage of adults receiving any outpatient mental health service increased from 19.08% (2004-2005) to 23.00% (2014-2015) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34). Although the proportionate increase in outpatient mental health service use for adults with serious psychological distress (54.17% to 68.40%) was larger than that for adults with less serious or no psychological distress (17.26% to 21.08%), the absolute increase in outpatient mental health service use was almost completely the result of growth in outpatient mental health service use by individuals with less serious or no psychological distress. Conclusions and Relevance: The recent increase in outpatient mental health service use occurred during a period of decline in serious psychological distress. Adults with less serious psychological distress accounted for most of the absolute increase in outpatient mental health service use, while adults with serious psychological distress experienced a greater relative increase in outpatient mental health service use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.